Package Details: linux-ck 6.12.1-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/linux-ck.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: linux-ck
Description: The Linux kernel and modules with ck's hrtimer patches
Upstream URL: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Linux-ck
Licenses: GPL-2.0-only
Provides: KSMBD-MODULE, VIRTUALBOX-GUEST-MODULES, WIREGUARD-MODULE
Replaces: virtualbox-guest-modules-arch, wireguard-arch
Submitter: graysky
Maintainer: graysky
Last Packager: graysky
Votes: 459
Popularity: 0.24
First Submitted: 2011-07-22 14:51 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-11-23 13:58 (UTC)

Dependencies (14)

Required by (7)

Sources (6)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 .. 308 Next › Last »

graysky commented on 2012-07-02 01:17 (UTC)

Bump to v3.4.4-3 Changelog: OPTIONAL setting to enable experimental BFS v0.424. Edit the PKGBUILD and enable the corresponding option in the header as you would for other options. Note that since this is experimental at this point, I will not be building it for the repo packages. Once CK has deemed it stable, I will. For more on the new BFS, see CK's blog: http://ck-hack.blogspot.com/2012/07/bfs-424-test.html Summary: 3.4.4-3 and 3.4.4-2 are IDENTICAL unless you enable the experimental BFS prior to building! Commit: http://pkgbuild.com/git/aur-mirror.git/commit/linux-ck?id=6851d92e49601ddb7b10dbbd25526e2468a10da2

blackout24 commented on 2012-07-01 13:05 (UTC)

Worked like a charm.

graysky commented on 2012-06-28 20:24 (UTC)

@oblique - Nope. See ck's comment about this on his blog: http://ck-hack.blogspot.com/2012/06/upgradeable-rwlocks-and-bfs.html

oblique commented on 2012-06-28 18:09 (UTC)

can you also add RIFS-ES scheduler? https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/6/16/123

graysky commented on 2012-06-28 09:03 (UTC)

Sorry dude, I haven't messed with that in a long time. Consult google or the author?

<deleted-account> commented on 2012-06-28 02:25 (UTC)

Actually, I just edited your PKGBUILD to use `make localyesconfig` before `make nconfig`, and the options are still marked as modules. Any ideas? Or is this a question for Steven Rostedt?

<deleted-account> commented on 2012-06-27 14:19 (UTC)

It looks like you ran into similar issues about two years ago! https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=845113 I'm not sure if the script has changed at all, but it looks like it's behaving as intended for the most part. The logic could be improved, but not without breaking some user's configs. I don't think it says it's supposed to mark all current modules to be compiled in, so that would still have to be done manually.

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 .. 308 Next › Last »