Package Details: linux-ck 6.12.1-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/linux-ck.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: linux-ck
Description: The Linux kernel and modules with ck's hrtimer patches
Upstream URL: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Linux-ck
Licenses: GPL-2.0-only
Provides: KSMBD-MODULE, VIRTUALBOX-GUEST-MODULES, WIREGUARD-MODULE
Replaces: virtualbox-guest-modules-arch, wireguard-arch
Submitter: graysky
Maintainer: graysky
Last Packager: graysky
Votes: 459
Popularity: 0.24
First Submitted: 2011-07-22 14:51 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-11-23 13:58 (UTC)

Dependencies (14)

Required by (6)

Sources (6)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 .. 308 Next › Last »

alucryd commented on 2012-06-18 16:21 (UTC)

@graysky: It seems inverting the two names will also invert the order in which the package functions are processed. However, the headers function depends on variables created in the linux-ck function, so for this to work, you need to copy the few lines that define those variables from header to linux-ck functions, this is the modified PKGBUILD I used: http://pastebin.com/2zTbr0kh. It should be possible to remove the lines from the linux-ck function rather than having them in both, but I haven't tested.

graysky commented on 2012-06-17 21:31 (UTC)

Sorry guys, ISP needs to rerun a line from the street to my cable box, so no updates until this happens. Doubtful until later in the week.

alucryd commented on 2012-06-15 14:29 (UTC)

@graysky: Thx for considering it, and yes right now I'm doing it manually, have to change some "n" to "y" anyway^^

graysky commented on 2012-06-14 11:14 (UTC)

@Alucryd - should be no problem but let me verify that it doesn't jack up my repo build script before I push it. For now, can manually make that switch and have a happy system?

alucryd commented on 2012-06-14 07:46 (UTC)

@skydrome: yeah you would have to make a single package() with everything that's under the two split package functions, it's easier to just switch the two package names since it would behave exactly the same, except the headers would be installed first.

skydrome commented on 2012-06-14 04:15 (UTC)

scratch that, that wont work without some modifications to the pkgbuild

skydrome commented on 2012-06-14 02:24 (UTC)

@alucryd, you could also just comment that line out and the package wont be split, the headers will be included into just the single package.

alucryd commented on 2012-06-13 09:31 (UTC)

@graysky: Since I'm installing the official kernel from the repo (just to have a functional kernel in case I screw up), I'm not having this problem, linux-headers is in my SyncFirst array and will install before linux, allowing the hooks to build their modules properly. I did some tests today, switching the two package functions will not have the desired effect. BUT turns out changing "true && pkgname=(linux-ck linux-ck-headers)" to "true && pkgname=(linux-ck-headers linux-ck)" will, plus it doesn't involve modifying the order the packages are built. Could you make this small change?

graysky commented on 2012-06-13 02:05 (UTC)

Bump to v3.4.2-3 Changelog: Added ARCH pactch to fix potential issue with nfs4.

graysky commented on 2012-06-12 19:51 (UTC)

@Alucryd - I modeled the PKGBUILD after the official ARCH PKGBUILD and am reluctant to change it. Do the hooks work with the ARCH kernel?

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 .. 308 Next › Last »