Package Details: linux-lqx 6.11.10.lqx1-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/linux-lqx.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: linux-lqx
Description: The Linux Liquorix kernel and modules
Upstream URL: https://liquorix.net/
Keywords: bbr2 bfq futex pds proton zen
Licenses: GPL-2.0-only
Provides: UKSMD-BUILTIN, VHBA-MODULE, VIRTUALBOX-GUEST-MODULES, WIREGUARD-MODULE
Submitter: akurei
Maintainer: sir_lucjan (damentz)
Last Packager: damentz
Votes: 161
Popularity: 1.81
First Submitted: 2011-08-08 16:08 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-11-22 16:37 (UTC)

Dependencies (19)

Required by (11)

Sources (3)

Pinned Comments

damentz commented on 2020-08-31 15:22 (UTC) (edited on 2021-12-21 18:25 (UTC) by damentz)

Official binaries of linux-lqx, linux-lqx-headers, and linux-lqx-docs are now available: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Unofficial_user_repositories#liquorix

Signing key import instructions: sudo pacman-key --keyserver hkps://keyserver.ubuntu.com --recv-keys 9AE4078033F8024D && sudo pacman-key --lsign-key 9AE4078033F8024D

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 .. 121 Next › Last »

jjdekroon commented on 2013-09-22 08:45 (UTC)

Okay, thanks for clearing that up, and I understand your decision. Also I have a remark on the latest kernel source. It seems aufs doesn't function on my system. I saw it is included in the kernel configuration. Greetings PsychoGame

damentz commented on 2013-09-22 00:22 (UTC)

Will BFS make a comeback? Probably not. The bugs in BFS are minor but noticeable. This biggest bug that's yet to be fixed is time keeping. This was documented heavily on the liquorix forums and lead me to choosing CFS over BFS with heavy configuration modifications. To answer your last question, just choose the zen-tune custom configuration, it will set rr_interval to 3 and change a few more defaults to improve performance.

jjdekroon commented on 2013-09-21 20:57 (UTC)

I have a small question about bfs. Will BFS make a comeback as standard scheduler in the builds in the future? Are the bugs which made the switch from BFS to CFS still existing in the latest kernel releases? Also if I want to compile the Liquorix kernel myself with BFS, what configuration do you recommend for the lowest latency? Greetings PsychoGame

shivik commented on 2013-08-16 16:05 (UTC)

linux-lqx.install gets overwritten every time you build, so not really a problem. If you build end then check linux-lqx.install you'll see that it says 3.6.10(or whatever the current version). Reuploaded anyway.

brenix commented on 2013-08-16 13:28 (UTC)

After update to 3.10.6, the linux-lqx.install file still contains the 3.10.5 version..just a FYI

damentz commented on 2013-08-11 02:04 (UTC)

Sorry, configs have been updated. Thanks for catching that, must have resynced my configs on an incomplete master branch earlier last month.

shivik commented on 2013-08-05 07:14 (UTC)

config* files need to be updated. I get a lot of config related options during build time, which are not present in the respective config.* file.

shivik commented on 2013-07-28 06:55 (UTC)

Thanks, damentz! Nvidia works on 3.10 with https://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/plain/trunk/nvidia-linux-3.10.patch?h=packages/nvidia Here's the PKGBUILD for 3.9.11 kernel: http://liquorix.herobo.com/linux-lqx/pkgsrc/3.9/linux-lqx-3.9.11-1.src.tar.gz

damentz commented on 2013-07-28 02:34 (UTC)

3.10 patch is out, but there's no proper support from nvidia and fglrx yet. Unless you guys have an easy work around, I'll recommend sticking to 3.9 until you can install an nvidia driver with sgfxi.

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 .. 121 Next › Last »