Package Details: litecoin-qt 0.21.4-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/litecoin-qt.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: litecoin-qt
Description: Peer-to-peer network based digital currency (Qt)
Upstream URL: https://www.litecoin.org/
Licenses: MIT
Conflicts: litecoin
Provides: litecoin
Submitter: Flink
Maintainer: a821
Last Packager: a821
Votes: 86
Popularity: 0.73
First Submitted: 2013-03-22 17:37 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-10-30 08:28 (UTC)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last »

rpodgorny commented on 2017-12-23 22:01 (UTC)

updated the sum and bumped pkgrel. thanks for you cooperation!

pixelyte commented on 2017-12-23 21:52 (UTC) (edited on 2017-12-24 01:51 (UTC) by pixelyte)

The downloaded source files are legit. The sha256 sum is not. Verified by the gpg signed message which has the new sum on litecoin.org.

rpodgorny commented on 2017-12-22 17:57 (UTC)

please, read the previous comments. ...can someone (independent) check what's going on? - the whole re-release thing smells. :-(

cleopatra17 commented on 2017-12-22 17:48 (UTC)

Checksum fails:

==> Validating source files with sha256sums... v0.14.2.tar.gz ... FAILED litecoin-qt.desktop ... Passed ==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check! ==> ERROR: Makepkg was unable to build litecoin-qt.

rpodgorny commented on 2017-12-16 15:31 (UTC)

hmmm, same for v0.13.3 according to github (25 days ago). wtf?

rpodgorny commented on 2017-12-16 15:30 (UTC)

...this is weird. 0.14.2 was released like 4 months ago.

but https://github.com/litecoin-project/litecoin/releases say just 25 days ago.

...are we sure they haven't been hacked or something? i'm quite hesitant to just update the shasum for such piece of (sensitive) software.

winny commented on 2017-12-16 02:37 (UTC)

Looks like v0.14.2.tar.gz fails the sha256sum.

rpodgorny commented on 2017-09-01 23:56 (UTC)

thanks for spotting this. fixed. try now, please...

turboNOMAD commented on 2017-09-01 16:34 (UTC)

This package requires not only boost-libs, but also boost as a makedepend.

rpodgorny commented on 2017-07-30 19:26 (UTC)

adopted and updated to latest version and qt5

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last »