Package Details: llvm-libs-git 18.0.0_r484887.953ae94149f0-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/llvm-git.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: llvm-git
Description: runtime libraries for llvm-git
Upstream URL: https://llvm.org/
Keywords: clang git lld lldb llvm polly
Licenses: custom:Apache 2.0 with LLVM Exception
Conflicts: llvm-libs
Provides: aur-llvm-libs-git, llvm-libs
Submitter: yurikoles
Maintainer: rjahanbakhshi
Last Packager: rjahanbakhshi
Votes: 118
Popularity: 0.009850
First Submitted: 2018-12-05 13:56 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-04-17 08:17 (UTC)

Required by (127)

Sources (2)

Pinned Comments

Lone_Wolf commented on 2021-08-16 11:26 (UTC)

When you have this package installed applications that are built against repo-llvm/clang WILL fail unless they are rebuild against this package.

This includes QTCreator, kdevelop , mesa, intel-compute-runtime, gnome-builder to name a few.

Lone_Wolf commented on 2020-08-22 12:18 (UTC) (edited on 2021-02-06 12:51 (UTC) by Lone_Wolf)

Archlinux currently has 3 llvm git implementations

  1. This package

    • It aims to provide a full llvm/clang compiler environment for development purposes.
    • Supports cross-compiling , bindings for external stuff (python, ocaml etc) , and some things not in extra-llvm.
    • intended to be used with archlinux core,extra & community repos
    • CONFLICTS with extra llvm/clang packages
    • Currently there's no repo with binary versions

  2. llvm-minimal-git

    • focuses on providing stuff needed for AUR mesa-git. Doesn't support cross-compiling or any bindings for external stuff like ocaml & python.
    • intended to be used with archlinux core,extra & community repos
    • compatible with extra llvm/clang packages
    • no repo with binary versions

  3. packages created & maintained by Lordheavy, an arch developer

    • intended to be used with archlinux testing repos
    • sometimes has problems on systems where testing repos are disabled
    • uses same package structure as llvm/clang in official repos
    • source
    • binary versions in LordHeavys unoffical repo

Lone_Wolf commented on 2019-04-12 20:41 (UTC) (edited on 2019-12-16 22:45 (UTC) by Lone_Wolf)

I've looked good at clang-trunk , llvm-svn, repo llvm/clang packages and think this package is now on route to become a worthy successor to llvm-svn .

  • llvm-libs-git holds the runtime libraries.

    It conflicts with the repo llvm-libs package. This is the only way to make sure the llvm linker from git is used, and that's needed for a full dev environment.

  • llvm-git

    has llvm , clang, compiler-rt, ocaml & python bindings, polly , lld , lldb .

The Package now uses a new environment variable to make ninja behave, NINJAFLAGS. If you want to use it adjust the snippet below to your desired values and add it to makepkg.conf.

Incase you are satisfied with ninja defaults you don't need to do anything.

# Add to makepkg.conf
# limit ninja to 20 jobs
# requires special code in PKGBUILD
# see ninja --help for additonal options
NINJAFLAGS="-j20"

The check() function fails rather often, but I do suggest to build with them. If build fails due to test failure you can add --nocheck to skip the tests.

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 .. 70 Next › Last »

thaewrapt commented on 2017-06-18 05:27 (UTC)

Great news, thanks!

kerberizer commented on 2017-06-17 18:34 (UTC)

[NOTICE] As discussed earlier, lld is now installed by its own package, lld-svn, following the practice in the official packages in "extra". In other words, if you need lld, please take care to install lld-svn. It is also a part of the llvm-toolchain-svn group for those who prefer shorthand solutions (the only package not part of the group is llvm-ocaml-svn).

kerberizer commented on 2017-06-14 08:14 (UTC)

@aperez, thank you very much for your understanding and cooperation. I'll see to make it done today.

aperez commented on 2017-06-14 08:09 (UTC)

@kerberizer: Agreed! I have added you as co-maintainer; I understand that is enough for you to be able to merge/orphan this package once your “llvm-svn” package includes “lld”, right? Let me know if you need something else from my side.

kerberizer commented on 2017-06-13 20:09 (UTC)

Hi! I'm the maintainer of llvm-svn[1] and lib32-llvm-svn[2]. I'd like to ask to take over the maintainership of this package and merge it with llvm-svn (I've had lldb-svn in a separate branch since late 2015[3], but couldn't merge it because of the conflict). I believe this will benefit the end users, who will have to deal with only one PKGBUILD (I also provide binary packages, built every 6 hours from the latest trunk[4]). Thank you in advance. ---- 1. https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/llvm-svn/ 2. https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/lib32-llvm-svn/ 3. https://github.com/kerberizer/llvm-svn/tree/enh/lldb-svn 4. https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Unofficial_user_repositories#llvm-svn

kerberizer commented on 2017-06-13 20:05 (UTC)

Hi! I'm the maintainer of llvm-svn[1] and lib32-llvm-svn[2]. I'd like to ask to take over the maintainership of this package and merge it with llvm-svn (lld has been provided by llvm-svn since late February[3]). I believe this will benefit the end users, who will have to deal with only one PKGBUILD (I also provide binary packages, built every 6 hours from the latest trunk[4]). Thank you in advance. ---- 1. https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/llvm-svn/ 2. https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/lib32-llvm-svn/ 3. https://github.com/kerberizer/llvm-svn/pull/9 4. https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Unofficial_user_repositories#llvm-svn

lahwaacz commented on 2017-06-13 19:30 (UTC)

Oh. I thought it was about extra/lld being linked against llvm 4.0...

kerberizer commented on 2017-06-13 19:06 (UTC)

@lahwaacz, lld is installed by llvm-svn (that was pull request #9 on GitHub) so there will inevitably be a file conflict. I'll really need to ask to merge those AUR packages: both lld-svn and lldb-svn... https://github.com/kerberizer/llvm-svn/pull/9

lahwaacz commented on 2017-06-13 19:02 (UTC)

There is already lld-svn in the AUR: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lld-svn/ Does it work?

thaewrapt commented on 2017-06-13 18:56 (UTC)

@kerberizer No problem, and in fact I would back your "separate package" solution, as it seems much more useful.

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 .. 70 Next › Last »