Package Details: notesnook-bin 3.0.23-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/notesnook-bin.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: notesnook-bin
Description: A fully open source & end-to-end encrypted note taking alternative to Evernote (binary release)
Upstream URL: https://github.com/streetwriters/notesnook
Keywords: & a alternative bin binary electron encrypted end-to-end evernote note notes open source to
Licenses: GPL-3.0-or-later
Conflicts: notesnook
Provides: notesnook
Submitter: qustavo
Maintainer: begin-theadventu
Last Packager: begin-theadventu
Votes: 10
Popularity: 0.33
First Submitted: 2022-09-05 10:12 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-12-25 16:35 (UTC)

Pinned Comments

begin-theadventu commented on 2023-06-21 08:17 (UTC) (edited on 2023-06-21 08:22 (UTC) by begin-theadventu)

sha256sum check for arm64 is now skipped, as I don't use this arch and I don't want to download the file with each release.

If you use it, feel free to provide me with the sums.

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3

usc commented on 2023-05-01 14:10 (UTC) (edited on 2023-05-01 14:10 (UTC) by usc)

hi,

it would be great to use a version in the name of the downloaded artifact. the current version always uses the name ${_appimage} which is constant for different versions. so when updating the package i still have this artifact in the local cache and the package manager does not download. to fix this i have to force a fresh download.

instead of this

source=("${_appimage}::${_githuburl}/releases/download/v${pkgver}/${_appimage}")

you could try something like this:

source=("${_appimage}-$pkgver-$pkgrel::${_githuburl}/releases/download/v${pkgver}/${_appimage}")

so the local downloaed file will have the version and the release-number in its name. if the version changes, the packagemanager will not try to uses the old binary artifact.

zxp19821005 commented on 2023-04-28 09:54 (UTC)

@cb474 fixed it.Thank you!

cb474 commented on 2023-04-28 08:59 (UTC)

I'm getting this error, when I try to run the update:

==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check!

Is the sha256sum in the pkgbuild correct?

begin-theadventu commented on 2023-04-06 02:04 (UTC) (edited on 2023-04-06 02:30 (UTC) by begin-theadventu)

Now I understand, thanks.

Though I don't understand the reason for this request, the -bin package does basically the same thing as -appimage with this change.

zxp19821005 commented on 2023-04-06 01:48 (UTC)

Maybe because of my poor English,@qustavo don't understand my idea,and I've made it rollback.You can find it from https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/log/?h=notesnook-bin.

begin-theadventu commented on 2023-04-06 01:31 (UTC)

Why not bring it to the AUR?

zxp19821005 commented on 2023-04-06 01:26 (UTC)

@begin-theadventu You can find it from https://github.com/zxp19821005/My_AUR_Files/tree/main/notesnook-bin.

Just do that:

mkdir notesnook-bin
cd notesnook-bin
wget -c https://github.com/zxp19821005/My_AUR_Files/tree/main/notesnook-bin/PKGBUILD
updpkgsums
makepkg -si

begin-theadventu commented on 2023-04-05 21:35 (UTC) (edited on 2023-04-05 23:29 (UTC) by begin-theadventu)

Could you please install the extracted files instead of AppImage?

qustavo commented on 2023-03-31 10:34 (UTC)

don't understand your comment

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3