yep... did the same... i thought b2sums were provided by nvidia... still it didn't work. it compiles but doesn't work with kernel 6.0.9 (official/zen)
Search Criteria
Package Details: nvidia-390xx-dkms 390.157-13
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/nvidia-390xx-utils.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | nvidia-390xx-utils |
Description: | NVIDIA drivers - module sources |
Upstream URL: | https://www.nvidia.com/ |
Licenses: | custom |
Provides: | NVIDIA-MODULE |
Submitter: | svenstaro |
Maintainer: | jonathon (vnctdj) |
Last Packager: | vnctdj |
Votes: | 60 |
Popularity: | 2.69 |
First Submitted: | 2020-03-11 17:29 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2024-11-25 23:34 (UTC) |
Dependencies (3)
- dkms (dkms-gitAUR, dkms-fast-zstdAUR)
- libglvnd (libglvnd-gitAUR)
- nvidia-390xx-utilsAUR
Required by (10)
- conky-lua-nv (optional)
- mhwd-nvidia-390xx (make)
- nsight-graphics (requires NVIDIA-MODULE)
- nvidia-exec (requires NVIDIA-MODULE)
- nvidia-exec-git (requires NVIDIA-MODULE)
- nvidia-pacman-hook (requires NVIDIA-MODULE) (optional)
- nvidia-xrun-pm (requires NVIDIA-MODULE)
- nvidiactl-git (requires NVIDIA-MODULE)
- optimus-manager-git (requires NVIDIA-MODULE)
- xorgxrdp-nvidia (requires NVIDIA-MODULE)
Sources (16)
- gcc-14.patch
- https://us.download.nvidia.com/XFree86/Linux-x86_64/390.157/NVIDIA-Linux-x86_64-390.157.run
- kernel-4.16+-memory-encryption.patch
- kernel-6.10.patch
- kernel-6.12.patch
- kernel-6.2.patch
- kernel-6.3.patch
- kernel-6.4.patch
- kernel-6.5.patch
- kernel-6.6.patch
- kernel-6.8.patch
- nvidia-390xx-utils.sysusers
- nvidia-390xx.rules
- nvidia-drm-outputclass.conf
- systemd-homed-override.conf
- systemd-suspend-override.conf
Latest Comments
« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 .. 26 Next › Last »
quimkaos commented on 2022-11-23 21:14 (UTC)
iestynapmwg commented on 2022-11-23 17:55 (UTC) (edited on 2022-11-23 18:00 (UTC) by iestynapmwg)
b2sum NVIDIA-Linux-x86_64-390.157.run
(b2sum is in coreutils)
Note that when editing PKGBUILD, the NVIDIA... file is the second-to-last in the b2sums list. The last is the kernel-4.16.patch. Which i don't know is even needed any more...? I was just doing a quick edit to try the new version out, and it worked.
quimkaos commented on 2022-11-23 11:39 (UTC)
@ iestynapmwg how did you get the b2sum
iestynapmwg commented on 2022-11-22 15:20 (UTC) (edited on 2022-11-22 15:58 (UTC) by iestynapmwg)
The long-promised update to the 390 drivers was released today by Nvidia. 390.157 is the current version on Nvidia's website.
ETA: Can confirm it compiles as-is with the last 5.19 kernel and with 6.0.9-zen1-1-zen, and it actually works -- i have xorg running just fine. All i did was change the version number to download and the b2sum in PKGBUILD for 390.154-1. (NOT -2, as that has the kernel-6.0 patch which didn't work.) It probably takes someone who knows what they're doing to package it properly, and the other 390-xx packages :)
badger_aav commented on 2022-11-15 08:57 (UTC)
Thank you FiestaLake! Worked for me on Dell xps 15z with NVIDIA GeForce GT 525M
RusWolf commented on 2022-11-12 14:12 (UTC)
Thank you FiestaLake. Thanks to you, I brought nvidia 620m back into operation, on linux-6.0.8-arch1-1.
saltyming commented on 2022-11-06 09:16 (UTC) (edited on 2022-11-06 09:16 (UTC) by saltyming)
Thanks to amazing works of the nvidia-340xx's aur maintainer, I could bring (some of) ACPI functions back in linux 6.0
Please consider adding it in this package!
arkades commented on 2022-11-05 00:09 (UTC) (edited on 2022-11-05 00:10 (UTC) by arkades)
In contrast to the previous two commentators it does not work with kernel 6.0.6-arch1-1 here.
The package builds of course, but I get exactly the same errors as Atom194.
How did you solve the issue?
festadurador commented on 2022-11-01 23:35 (UTC)
It finally works in kernel 6.0 good work guys :D
Pinned Comments
jonathon commented on 2022-05-26 09:46 (UTC)
Please don't flag this package out-of-date unless a new version has been released by NVIDIA.
jonathon commented on 2021-12-26 22:44 (UTC) (edited on 2021-12-26 22:44 (UTC) by jonathon)
The DKMS package guidelines are explicit that
linux-headers
should not be a dependency of any DKMS package.As a concrete example of why including that as a hard dependency is a bad idea, what happens when
linux
is not an installed kernel?jonathon commented on 2020-10-19 12:41 (UTC) (edited on 2021-05-11 14:18 (UTC) by jonathon)
PACKAGE NEEDS LONG TERM MAINTAINER
I have adopted the 390xx packages to keep them secure. I do not run any 390xx hardware so will not notice any breakages and cannot test any changes.
Until such time as someone else steps up to maintain these packages - ideally someone who actually has 390xx hardware - I have to rely on you to tell me what changes are needed.
Don't expect a response if you post only "this doesn't work", and do not email me to complain about the package not working!
Use this forum thread for discussion: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=1946926
A binary package is also available in my kernel-lts unofficial user repository.