Yes: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/73075 . Fix is imminent.
Also, an issue with Xorg isn't an issue with this package. Please use the forum for this sort of thing.
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/nvidia-390xx-utils.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | nvidia-390xx-utils |
Description: | NVIDIA drivers - module sources |
Upstream URL: | https://www.nvidia.com/ |
Licenses: | custom |
Provides: | NVIDIA-MODULE |
Submitter: | svenstaro |
Maintainer: | jonathon (vnctdj) |
Last Packager: | vnctdj |
Votes: | 60 |
Popularity: | 2.69 |
First Submitted: | 2020-03-11 17:29 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2024-11-25 23:34 (UTC) |
« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Next › Last »
Yes: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/73075 . Fix is imminent.
Also, an issue with Xorg isn't an issue with this package. Please use the forum for this sort of thing.
After upgrading xorg-server
to v21.1.2 I can't resume my laptop from suspend.
On nouveau everything works fine.
Downgrading server to 21.1.1 resolves the problem so issue is related to nvidia-390xx driver and newest xorg-server
.
I'm wondering if anyone else has this problem?
@jonathon 30-nvidia-ignoreabi.conf
is not needed with 390.147
Thanks a lot @Scarlet and @Juggrnaut
I was have the error message:
primus: fatal: Bumblebee daemon reported: error: [XORG] (EE) NVIDIA: Use the -ignoreABI option to override this check.
The solution for me was edit the file /etc/bumblebee/xorg.conf.nvidia like the recommendation of @Juggrnaut and add in the Section "Device" zone, the follow lines:
Section "Device"
...
BusID "PCI:01:00:0"
Option "AllowExternalGpus" "true" # If the GPU is external
...
EndSection
And at the end of the file, add the follow section like the recommendation of @Scarlet:
Section "ServerFlags"
Option "IgnoreABI" "1"
EndSection
Or, just update your copy of nvidia-390xx-utils
as it includes an override file.
For all those with that Xorg ABI error and having no /etc/X11/xorg.conf
:
Search for a file called /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/20-server_flags.conf
. If it does not exist yet, create it. Amend the file and paste the well-known contents there:
Section "ServerFlags"
Option "IgnoreABI" "1"
EndSection
Let's see if Nvidia indeed fixes that. According to https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=2003589#p2003589, Nvidia stated it is supported and receives compat fixes until the end of 2022
.
After adding in "IgnoreABI" to "/etc/bumblebee/xorg.conf.nvidia" I now receive the following error and it doesn't load:
(WW) NVIDIA: The driver will continue to load, but may behave strangely.
(WW) NVIDIA: This driver was compiled against the X.Org server SDK from commit 4c00369024c9754e670fca37804711fef2980e2f and may not be compatible with the final version of this SDK.
UPDATE <SOLVED> I've figured out my issue and posting it in case anyone else runs into the same problem.
Prior to the recent updates, I never needed to modify the "/etc/bumblebee/xorg.conf.nvidia" file and it worked just fine OOTB. Now after the recent updates, I had to modify that file to now also include the BusID of the nvidia card. Details found here: https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bumblebee#Multiple_NVIDIA_Graphics_Cards_or_NVIDIA_Optimus
So after adding in the BusID (along with the "IgnoreABI" setting), it is working again.
Do you guys have a solution to avoid the XID errors which freeze desktop ?
Impressive, a patch put in place within a day....and here I was getting ready to just concede "end of life" for this old card ;)
I've included an override file with 390.144-3 as a stop-gap until Nvidia update the driver - while things might randomly break, at least Xorg will load...
Pinned Comments
jonathon commented on 2022-05-26 09:46 (UTC)
Please don't flag this package out-of-date unless a new version has been released by NVIDIA.
jonathon commented on 2021-12-26 22:44 (UTC) (edited on 2021-12-26 22:44 (UTC) by jonathon)
The DKMS package guidelines are explicit that
linux-headers
should not be a dependency of any DKMS package.As a concrete example of why including that as a hard dependency is a bad idea, what happens when
linux
is not an installed kernel?jonathon commented on 2020-10-19 12:41 (UTC) (edited on 2021-05-11 14:18 (UTC) by jonathon)
PACKAGE NEEDS LONG TERM MAINTAINER
I have adopted the 390xx packages to keep them secure. I do not run any 390xx hardware so will not notice any breakages and cannot test any changes.
Until such time as someone else steps up to maintain these packages - ideally someone who actually has 390xx hardware - I have to rely on you to tell me what changes are needed.
Don't expect a response if you post only "this doesn't work", and do not email me to complain about the package not working!
Use this forum thread for discussion: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=1946926
A binary package is also available in my kernel-lts unofficial user repository.