Package Details: opencl-nvidia-390xx 390.157-14

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/nvidia-390xx-utils.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: nvidia-390xx-utils
Description: OpenCL implemention for NVIDIA
Upstream URL: https://www.nvidia.com/
Licenses: custom
Conflicts: opencl-nvidia
Provides: opencl-driver, opencl-nvidia
Submitter: svenstaro
Maintainer: jonathon (vnctdj)
Last Packager: vnctdj
Votes: 60
Popularity: 0.96
First Submitted: 2020-03-11 17:29 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2025-01-24 07:30 (UTC)

Dependencies (2)

Required by (67)

Sources (17)

Pinned Comments

vnctdj commented on 2025-01-24 07:37 (UTC)

Use this forum thread for discussion: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=1946926

jonathon commented on 2022-05-26 09:46 (UTC)

Please don't flag this package out-of-date unless a new version has been released by NVIDIA.

jonathon commented on 2021-12-26 22:44 (UTC) (edited on 2021-12-26 22:44 (UTC) by jonathon)

The DKMS package guidelines are explicit that linux-headers should not be a dependency of any DKMS package.

As a concrete example of why including that as a hard dependency is a bad idea, what happens when linux is not an installed kernel?

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 .. 28 Next › Last »

drankinatty commented on 2023-02-08 09:21 (UTC)

Let's just say things look very grim. https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=2083569

shnappi commented on 2023-02-08 02:10 (UTC) (edited on 2023-02-08 02:15 (UTC) by shnappi)

I think it's not a kernel, glibc update 2.36-7 => 2.37-2 cause errors in my case. I revert it and problem with X server go away.

upd: my kernel package linux-zen 6.1.9.zen1-2

mischa commented on 2023-02-08 01:06 (UTC)

@drankinatty I found the same issue here after the (default and lts) kernel update today.

drankinatty commented on 2023-02-08 00:42 (UTC) (edited on 2023-02-08 01:46 (UTC) by drankinatty)

This is odd. After update linux (6.1.9.arch1-1 -> 6.1.9.arch1-2) on 2/7, I can no longer connect to the X-server. This seems kernel/driver related as Intel graphics has no issue. startx fails. (could not connect to X server) No problem with prior kernel 6.1.9.arch1-1. Now X will not start on the normal kernel or LTS. Anybody else see anything similar? Exact startx error is "xinit: unable to connect to X server: Connection refused" (permission, dbus, pam ??) Xorg.0.log is quite happy as the nvidia module is found and loaded without any problem and X does appear to be fully starting before the "Connection Refused" error.

arkades commented on 2023-01-31 15:48 (UTC) (edited on 2023-01-31 16:43 (UTC) by arkades)

With linux 6.1.8.arch1-1 and linux-lts 5.15.90-1 installed pacman throws:

$ pacman -U nvidia-390xx-utils-390.157-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz
...
(2/3) Install DKMS modules
==> dkms install --no-depmod nvidia/390.157 -k 6.1.8-arch1-1
==> dkms install --no-depmod nvidia/390.157 -k 5.15.90-1-lts
==> depmod 6.1.8-arch1-1
==> depmod 5.15.90-1-lts
==> ERROR: Missing 4.15.5-1-ARCH kernel headers for module nvidia/390.157.

mkinitcpio builds successfully though.

Greg0sky commented on 2023-01-31 09:40 (UTC)

I'm not sure if this is the right place to report issue with the driver, but since I updated my system in November 2022 my system segfaults every time I run windows manager. I was getting some help here: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=281047 and here: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=282801 (these two are the same thread, I thought the issue was solved after falling back to LTS kernel, but it did not help).

saltyming commented on 2023-01-18 13:58 (UTC)

@bpetlert I cannot bring back brightness even using those kernel parameters. Don't know why acpi_backlight=video doesn't make /sys/class/backlight/acpi_video0 path.

bpetlert commented on 2023-01-17 11:32 (UTC)

@FiestaLake Yes, I have backlight problem too.

Kernel parameter acpi_backlight=vendor and recent kernel make /sys/class/backlight directory empty. Changing it to acpi_backlight=video solved problem for me. Another machine, I need to remove acpi_backlight parameter to fix this issue.

saltyming commented on 2023-01-16 14:42 (UTC)

Is there anyone having problems with brightness with recent kernel?

vnctdj commented on 2023-01-15 23:07 (UTC)

@ptr1337 These patches mention "390.154", are they still needed for 390.157? Have they been tested with version 390.157? And what about a non-llvm kernel?

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 .. 28 Next › Last »