First at all thanks for the driver, i wish to know how to mentain it or make such a package
as i'm still use a GT119. And i can tell this clone it's work better than the driver from
my past windows 10Xcleaner than. Seems like you know what to do with a machine.
>thank you<
Search Criteria
Package Details: opencl-nvidia-390xx 390.157-14
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/nvidia-390xx-utils.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | nvidia-390xx-utils |
Description: | OpenCL implemention for NVIDIA |
Upstream URL: | https://www.nvidia.com/ |
Licenses: | custom |
Conflicts: | opencl-nvidia |
Provides: | opencl-driver, opencl-nvidia |
Submitter: | svenstaro |
Maintainer: | jonathon (vnctdj) |
Last Packager: | vnctdj |
Votes: | 60 |
Popularity: | 0.96 |
First Submitted: | 2020-03-11 17:29 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2025-01-24 07:30 (UTC) |
Dependencies (2)
- zlib (zlib-ng-compat-gitAUR, zlib-gitAUR, zlib-ng-compat)
- opencl-headers (opencl-headers-gitAUR) (optional) – headers necessary for OpenCL development
Required by (67)
- aftershotpro2 (requires opencl-nvidia) (optional)
- aftershotpro3 (requires opencl-nvidia) (optional)
- arrayfire-git (requires opencl-driver) (optional)
- bfgminer-git (requires opencl-driver) (optional)
- computecpp (requires opencl-driver)
- cpu-x-opencl (requires opencl-driver) (optional)
- cuda-10.0 (requires opencl-nvidia)
- cuda-10.2 (requires opencl-nvidia)
- cuda-11.1 (requires opencl-nvidia)
- cuda-11.7 (requires opencl-nvidia)
- cuda-8.0 (requires opencl-nvidia)
- cuda-9.0 (requires opencl-nvidia)
- cuda-9.2 (requires opencl-nvidia)
- cuda11.1 (requires opencl-nvidia)
- cuda11.4 (requires opencl-nvidia)
- cuda11.4-versioned (requires opencl-nvidia)
- cuda12.0 (requires opencl-nvidia)
- cuda12.0-versioned (requires opencl-nvidia)
- cytoscape (requires opencl-driver) (optional)
- davinci-resolve (requires opencl-driver)
- Show 47 more...
Sources (17)
- gcc-14.patch
- https://us.download.nvidia.com/XFree86/Linux-x86_64/390.157/NVIDIA-Linux-x86_64-390.157.run
- kernel-4.16+-memory-encryption.patch
- kernel-6.10.patch
- kernel-6.12.patch
- kernel-6.13.patch
- kernel-6.2.patch
- kernel-6.3.patch
- kernel-6.4.patch
- kernel-6.5.patch
- kernel-6.6.patch
- kernel-6.8.patch
- nvidia-390xx-utils.sysusers
- nvidia-390xx.rules
- nvidia-drm-outputclass.conf
- systemd-homed-override.conf
- systemd-suspend-override.conf
Latest Comments
« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Next › Last »
rootyp commented on 2022-05-18 08:05 (UTC) (edited on 2022-05-18 08:05 (UTC) by rootyp)
BlackIkeEagle commented on 2022-03-13 10:51 (UTC)
for the upcoming 5.17 kernel: https://gitlab.com/herecura/packages/nvidia-390xx-dkms/-/blob/herecura/kernel-5.17.patch by Joan Bruguera
jonathon commented on 2021-12-26 22:44 (UTC) (edited on 2021-12-26 22:44 (UTC) by jonathon)
The DKMS package guidelines are explicit that linux-headers
should not be a dependency of any DKMS package.
As a concrete example of why including that as a hard dependency is a bad idea, what happens when linux
is not an installed kernel?
Shalrath commented on 2021-12-26 04:22 (UTC)
linux-headers should be a hard dependency of this because installation fails without them. Dkms is a dependency of the package, but the linux-headers are only an optional dependency of dkms, so it is possible that this package is installed without the linux-headers being present, leading to a failure.
DAC324 commented on 2021-12-21 11:09 (UTC)
@duht: See https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/nvidia-390xx-utils/#comment-836318 and check if it can help you as well.
@all: I am using an ancient desktop PC equipped with a GeForce GTX 560 card, and since kernel 5.16-rc4, there are no problems with suspend here.
quimkaos commented on 2021-12-21 01:04 (UTC) (edited on 2021-12-21 01:19 (UTC) by quimkaos)
Anyone having a complete broken xorg after last update? i'm getting a blinking cursor and only TTY access. The driver shows loaded lspci...
ignore me ... i fixed it... had to force mkinitcpio -P
duht commented on 2021-12-21 00:26 (UTC) (edited on 2021-12-21 00:32 (UTC) by duht)
Thank you @jonathon.
I thought this bug is only related to this poorly supported nvidia-390xx driver in conjunction with newest xorg-server, like previous ABI bug (there is no problem with nouveau), but it looks like a general xserver issue. Thanks again.
jonathon commented on 2021-12-20 23:59 (UTC)
Yes: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/73075 . Fix is imminent.
Also, an issue with Xorg isn't an issue with this package. Please use the forum for this sort of thing.
Pinned Comments
vnctdj commented on 2025-01-24 07:37 (UTC)
Use this forum thread for discussion: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=1946926
jonathon commented on 2022-05-26 09:46 (UTC)
Please don't flag this package out-of-date unless a new version has been released by NVIDIA.
jonathon commented on 2021-12-26 22:44 (UTC) (edited on 2021-12-26 22:44 (UTC) by jonathon)
The DKMS package guidelines are explicit that
linux-headers
should not be a dependency of any DKMS package.As a concrete example of why including that as a hard dependency is a bad idea, what happens when
linux
is not an installed kernel?