Search Criteria
Package Details: pure-maps-git 3.4.0.r0.gb594d2f-1
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/pure-maps-git.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | pure-maps-git |
Description: | Display vector and raster maps, places, routes, etc. |
Upstream URL: | https://github.com/rinigus/pure-maps |
Licenses: | GPL-3.0-or-later |
Conflicts: | pure-maps |
Provides: | pure-maps |
Submitter: | dreieck |
Maintainer: | xiota |
Last Packager: | xiota |
Votes: | 0 |
Popularity: | 0.000000 |
First Submitted: | 2023-10-31 18:59 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2024-10-29 05:17 (UTC) |
Dependencies (15)
- hicolor-icon-theme (hicolor-icon-theme-gitAUR)
- kirigami2 (kirigami2-gitAUR)
- mapbox-gl-qmlAUR
- python-lxml
- python-pyotherside (python-pyotherside-moment-gitAUR)
- qt5-declarative (qt5-declarative-gitAUR)
- qt5-location
- qt5-multimedia
- qt5-quickcontrols2 (qt5-quickcontrols2-gitAUR)
- qt5-sensors
- s2geometryAUR
- cmake (cmake-gitAUR) (make)
- git (git-gitAUR, git-glAUR) (make)
- ninja (ninja-kitwareAUR, ninja-memAUR, ninja-fuchsia-gitAUR, ninja-gitAUR, ninja-jobserverAUR) (make)
- qt5-tools (make)
Latest Comments
dreieck commented on 2023-11-26 15:37 (UTC) (edited on 2023-11-27 17:02 (UTC) by dreieck)
Thanks @xiota for your comment.
Can you point me to where this is stated? In the VCS package guidelines I do not have found that information.
Yes, but they do not state that more information is problematic.
The VCS package guidelines even contradit itself if they are read in a strict manner:
but then gives the example
where the latter adds more stuff than just
.rREVISION
.Taken the first comment literally, the git commit hash also must be removed, and the second one gives an example that has more information than the recommendet information.
So I infer that it is OK to have more information in
$pkgver
.Anyway, I disown this since I do not use it, feel free to adopt and modify.
Regards!
dreieck commented on 2023-11-25 11:05 (UTC) (edited on 2023-11-25 11:08 (UTC) by dreieck)
Ahoj @xiota,
As I understand,
$url
should if possible point to the project's upstream page so that users who stumble upon the package get more information about the software. In my understanding it is more for the end user than for the package maintainer. And sohttps://rinigus.github.io/pure-maps
seems the more official upstream page to me than the github repository.(Why) am I wrong?
I see that I have more information than needed, but why is how I do it problematic?
Without a convincing argument that my solution is problematic or "forbidden" I will not change it, since it easily gives information that might be interesting (when the last update was) or useful in some support cases (what the last update's commit hash is).
I removed
python-geomag
from thedepends
array. However, I cannot check, since neithermapbox-gl-native
normapbox-gl-native-git
build for me.Regards and thanks for your comment!