Search Criteria
Package Details: sensible-utils 0.0.24-1
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/sensible-utils.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | sensible-utils |
Description: | Utilities for sensible alternative selection |
Upstream URL: | https://salsa.debian.org/debian/sensible-utils |
Licenses: | GPL-2.0-or-later |
Conflicts: | sensible-browser, sensible-browser-git, sensible-editor, sensible-editor-git, sensible-pager, sensible-pager-git, sensible-terminal, sensible-terminal-git, sensible-utils-data, sensible-utils-data-git, sensible-utils-git |
Provides: | sensible-browser, sensible-editor |
Submitter: | pcarrier |
Maintainer: | xiota |
Last Packager: | xiota |
Votes: | 27 |
Popularity: | 0.000007 |
First Submitted: | 2012-04-05 14:14 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2024-08-11 14:23 (UTC) |
Dependencies (3)
- bash (bash-devel-static-gitAUR, bash-devel-gitAUR, busybox-coreutilsAUR, bash-gitAUR)
- po4a (make)
- ed (check)
Required by (4)
- devscripts (requires sensible-browser)
- devscripts (requires sensible-editor)
- git-dpm (requires sensible-editor) (optional)
- reportbug (optional)
Latest Comments
« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next › Last »
eclairevoyant commented on 2023-06-18 23:59 (UTC) (edited on 2023-06-19 00:03 (UTC) by eclairevoyant)
@xiota
Nonsense, build is only run once. That is how split packages work. If you use an AUR helper then broken AUR helpers may run builds multiple times. Not anyone else's problem.
That's an aurweb bug and has nothing to do with the packaging. But this shouldn't be conflicting with anything anyway, it's other packages' job to conflict with this (canonical) one.
provides
should also be removed.fbrennan commented on 2023-05-30 04:12 (UTC)
If you don't want to watch a cripple type you can just take my word for it @xiota is railing against nothing:
fbrennan commented on 2023-05-30 04:06 (UTC)
ORLY?
(That is a session you can play back with
scriptreplay
. PE firmly between KAC.)fbrennan commented on 2023-05-29 23:59 (UTC)
Never was true to my knowledge and certainly isn't as of 0.0.19-2.
fbrennan commented on 2023-05-27 17:18 (UTC)
I apologize for signing the package myself, but Bastien Roucariès, the maintainer, has not done so with a key that will remain valid past the 11th of June. I've emailed with some alarm about this. If he reissues his key I will reissue the package.
fbrennan commented on 2023-05-15 01:53 (UTC)
What is «a fd»? Can you try «pacman -Ql»?
Note that it is now a metapackage so you can choose which ones you want.
« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next › Last »