Package Details: spideroak-one 7.5.2-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/spideroak-one.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: spideroak-one
Description: Secure file backup, sync and sharing client. SpiderOak One client.
Upstream URL: https://crossclave.com/
Keywords: backup
Licenses: LicenseRef-SpiderOakONE
Provides: spideroak
Submitter: warnem2
Maintainer: warnem2
Last Packager: warnem2
Votes: 267
Popularity: 0.093022
First Submitted: 2015-07-18 19:17 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2025-04-20 03:51 (UTC)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 Next › Last »

<deleted-account> commented on 2011-06-08 05:00 (UTC)

Another thought, it looks like you didn't update rel version, so that even though the md5's are correct, nobody will be notified a fix is out. This may be intentional though.

<deleted-account> commented on 2011-06-08 04:59 (UTC)

1) dbus is still an optional dep vs an actual dep because the CLI does not need it. 2) they have released a 'slackware' build recently, that amounts out to a .tar.gz that could simply be cp'd from src -> pkg. This would be a cleaner way to install this app as it is more platform agnostic then debian.

notizblock commented on 2011-05-08 07:44 (UTC)

updated & disowned since i don't use spideroak regularly.

<deleted-account> commented on 2011-05-07 19:01 (UTC)

Also, technically dbus is an optional package because this client can run perfectly well in CLI(headless) mode without it.

<deleted-account> commented on 2011-05-07 19:00 (UTC)

==> Validating source files with md5sums... spideroak_3.7.9801_x86_64.deb ... FAILED LICENSE ... Passed ==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check! [ebrodeur@hobbes.ujami.net] [~/spideroak]% makepkg -g ==> Retrieving Sources... -> Found spideroak_3.7.9801_x86_64.deb -> Found LICENSE ==> Generating checksums for source files... md5sums=('27f20650ace00db96886e49c33b6e0b7' '53d58e8dd9d8e5fb23919f655b164e90') fix it or disown it so I can:)

sfabius commented on 2011-03-27 15:29 (UTC)

For some reason I didn't get the 'out of date' emails I usually get. I'm happy to have another maintainer and I don't know if it's good to have more than one. In any case, I am disowning so someone else can take this up.

iosonofabio commented on 2011-03-19 21:29 (UTC)

sfabius, are you still mantaining the package? Could you update the PKGBUILD to the last version please?

cb474 commented on 2011-03-15 08:56 (UTC)

I'm getting did not pass the validity check error. I tried Xenkth suggestions for changing the pkgver line and the two md5 values, but still get the error.

<deleted-account> commented on 2011-03-04 18:15 (UTC)

I've created a new package here on AUR called "spideroak-latest" with the intent to provide updates even when beta versions are released. http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47096

<deleted-account> commented on 2011-02-24 07:41 (UTC)

Could some one give me the PKGBUILD file for the 3.7.9766 version that just got released? Thanks :)

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 Next › Last »