Package Details: stellarium 24.4-4

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/stellarium.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: stellarium
Description: Software which renders realistic skies in real time with OpenGL
Upstream URL: https://stellarium.org
Licenses: GPL-2.0-or-later
Submitter: arojas
Maintainer: carlosal1015
Last Packager: carlosal1015
Votes: 74
Popularity: 1.36
First Submitted: 2022-04-01 18:43 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2025-01-04 13:49 (UTC)

Pinned Comments

carlosal1015 commented on 2022-11-01 05:22 (UTC)

Pre-built binaries of this package and its dependencies can be found in the arch4edu repository.

carlosal1015 commented on 2022-04-02 19:14 (UTC) (edited on 2022-07-07 16:46 (UTC) by carlosal1015)

Important note: Is recommended to receive the following key before to install:

$ gpg --recv-keys BF38D4D02A328DFF

Also is possible skip the verification, adding the flag for (e.g makepkg, yay) --skippgpcheck, --nopgpfetch, respectively.

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next › Last »

carlosal1015 commented on 2023-10-07 13:27 (UTC)

Hi @CaliforniaCoach, I tried today and it works, maybe you could made an attempt before with this command gpg --keyserver hkp://keyserver.ubuntu.com:80 --recv-keys 79151C2E6351E7278DA1A730BF38D4D02A328DFF

dimich commented on 2023-10-07 13:23 (UTC)

@CaliforniaCoach What is output of

$ gpg --verify -v stellarium-23.3.tar.gz.asc stellarium-23.3.tar.gz

?

CaliforniaCoach commented on 2023-10-07 12:21 (UTC) (edited on 2023-10-07 12:22 (UTC) by CaliforniaCoach)

I am getting a PGP signature verification error, even though I have received the required keys (I know I could disable sig checking, then building works fine, but I would feel better with enabled sig checking):

$ makepkg -s
==> Making package: stellarium 23.3-1 (Sat 07 Oct 2023 02:13:40 PM CEST)
==> Checking runtime dependencies...
==> Checking buildtime dependencies...
==> Retrieving sources...
  -> Found stellarium-23.3.tar.gz
  -> Found stellarium-23.3.tar.gz.asc
  -> Found indi-2.0.patch
==> Validating source files with md5sums...
    stellarium-23.3.tar.gz ... Passed
    stellarium-23.3.tar.gz.asc ... Skipped
    indi-2.0.patch ... Passed
==> Validating source files with sha256sums...
    stellarium-23.3.tar.gz ... Passed
    stellarium-23.3.tar.gz.asc ... Skipped
    indi-2.0.patch ... Passed
==> Verifying source file signatures with gpg...
    stellarium-23.3.tar.gz ... FAILED (error during signature verification)
==> ERROR: One or more PGP signatures could not be verified!

Note: This is different to the error which I get if I do not have the keys at all. In that case, the last two lines look like this:

    stellarium-23.3.tar.gz ... FAILED (unknown public key 9380E47C0374E169)
==> ERROR: One or more PGP signatures could not be verified!

Mr.Smith1974 commented on 2023-05-12 06:21 (UTC) 

 % gpg --recv-keys 9380E47C0374E169
 gpg: keyserver receive failed: Server indicated a failure

afontenot commented on 2023-03-07 08:14 (UTC)

Anyone who isn't using the telescope control plugin (probably the overwhelming majority of us) can simply remove the libindi dependency and build with

-DUSE_PLUGIN_TELESCOPECONTROL=0

As of version 1.2, that's the only code that uses it.

astrograzl commented on 2023-03-06 23:23 (UTC) 

+    -DPREFER_SYSTEM_INDILIB=No \

Lubiquity commented on 2023-03-03 17:45 (UTC) (edited on 2023-03-03 17:50 (UTC) by Lubiquity)

As Stellarium is not yet available for libindi-2.0.0 (3038-issue not solved), a solution is to downgrade libindi to 1.9:

  1. Uninstall libindi and stellarium
  2. Download a libindi package from the archive repository (example ; libindi-1.9.9-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.zst)
  3. Install the local package with pacman -U <local package> (example : pacman -U /tmp/libindi-1.9.9-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.zst)
  4. Add libindi to the Ignore package list (IgnorePkg = libindi in /etc/pacman.conf)
  5. Build and install the stellarium package

warren.isaac commented on 2023-02-12 02:12 (UTC)

@HoonSol Yes, though being notified here helps a lot. Imho libindi is a perfect example for what should actually be an optional dependency.

HoonSol commented on 2023-02-11 15:45 (UTC) (edited on 2023-02-11 15:45 (UTC) by HoonSol)

You like to live dangerously, I see, @warren.isaac.

Just for reference to anyone reading this page, I too am getting the same error, and for the same reasons.

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next › Last »