Search Criteria
Package Details: stlink-server 2.1.1-3
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/stlink-server.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | stlink-server |
Description: | An application to share the debug interface of a single ST-LINK board among several host applications, typically a debugging tool and a monitoring tool |
Upstream URL: | 'https://www.st.com/en/development-tools/st-link-server.html |
Keywords: | debug Development monitoring server Software st-link stm32 Tools UART USB |
Licenses: | custom:SLA0048 |
Submitter: | nullik |
Maintainer: | yjun |
Last Packager: | yjun |
Votes: | 1 |
Popularity: | 0.000000 |
First Submitted: | 2021-04-14 14:05 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2024-10-18 13:44 (UTC) |
Latest Comments
malsyned commented on 2024-11-15 16:37 (UTC)
I'm getting a sha256sum error for the PDF as well. The PDF looks to have downloaded correctly and contain the license text, but the sha256sum is
f9270b447c7d223007703f800292d58ca2716a041ceae250d3e3c5e3fc2bd4f8
which is different from the one specified in thePKGBUILD
.kumen commented on 2024-11-11 19:03 (UTC) (edited on 2024-11-11 19:04 (UTC) by kumen)
sha256sums of
SLA0048_ST-LINK-SERVER.pdf
was changed. Maybe it can be set to:"SKIP"
?Upstream URL have additional
'
characteryjun commented on 2024-10-18 13:45 (UTC)
@Arkyos fixed.
Arkyos commented on 2024-10-15 19:56 (UTC)
URL is unreachable: curl: (92) HTTP/2 stream 1 was not closed cleanly: INTERNAL_ERROR (err 2)
yjun commented on 2024-07-12 15:09 (UTC)
@samdorey fixed.:)
samdorey commented on 2024-07-09 14:00 (UTC) (edited on 2024-07-09 14:25 (UTC) by samdorey)
The SHA256 seems to be outdated.
Skipping integrity check still gives an error when using yay:
/home/user/.cache/yay/stlink-server/PKGBUILD: line 63: cd: /home/user/.cache/yay/stlink-server/src/en.st-link-server_v2.1.1-2: No such file or directory
Looks like the zip isn't being uncompressed, is _bundle_sh_extract() ever used?
yjun commented on 2024-05-12 10:24 (UTC)
Updated to the latest version.
yangwenbo99 commented on 2023-04-26 21:33 (UTC)
Git diff FYI.
zkrx commented on 2023-02-15 15:00 (UTC)
Hey, package looks broken:
Also, pkgrel should be bumped to 3 (even better: pkgver should be updated).
Here is my diff on the PKGBUILD for your convenience: