Done: http://www.sublimetext.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=22393
Search Criteria
Package Details: sublime-text-dev 4.4184-1
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/sublime-text-dev.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | sublime-text-dev |
Description: | Sophisticated text editor for code, html and prose - dev build |
Upstream URL: | https://www.sublimetext.com/dev |
Licenses: | custom |
Conflicts: | sublime-text |
Provides: | sublime-text |
Submitter: | realitygaps |
Maintainer: | SunRed (edub4rt) |
Last Packager: | SunRed |
Votes: | 517 |
Popularity: | 0.091538 |
First Submitted: | 2011-11-10 18:32 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2024-11-27 22:50 (UTC) |
Dependencies (2)
- gtk3 (gtk3-no_deadkeys_underlineAUR, gtk3-classicAUR, gtk3-classic-xfceAUR, gtk3-patched-filechooser-icon-viewAUR)
- libpng (libpng-gitAUR, libpng-apngAUR)
Required by (0)
Sources (3)
Latest Comments
« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 .. 22 Next › Last »
Marcel_K commented on 2015-12-14 00:29 (UTC)
sender commented on 2015-12-13 22:52 (UTC)
@Marcel_K Personally I have no affinity with this layer of tech or any authority in the development process of ST. If you feel you can escalate this in the right way to the developer, you have my support ;) The post says that the old ABI will still be available, so in the meantime we are probably fine.
Marcel_K commented on 2015-12-12 20:14 (UTC)
According to the script in [1], the binaries should be recompiled. However, this package relies on pre-compiled binaries. Should this be escalated to the developer?
[1] https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2015-December/027597.html
<deleted-account> commented on 2015-12-07 03:50 (UTC)
Thank you for this package!
sender commented on 2015-11-07 14:00 (UTC)
@horosgrisa are you sure you are running the sublime-text-dev package, and the latest version? I don't get how you could get `WM_CLASS(STRING) = "sublime_text", "Sublime_text"`. Anyway, it doesn't seem to be possible to specify multiple values for `StartupWMClass`.
horosgrisa commented on 2015-11-05 06:44 (UTC)
@sender Now in KDE 5 ST window shows in another icon. `xprop WM_CLASS` returns `WM_CLASS(STRING) = "sublime_text", "Sublime_text"`. I changed `StartupWMClass=subl3` to `StartupWMClass=sublime_text` and now all work normal.
<deleted-account> commented on 2015-11-01 16:06 (UTC)
Icon files are conflicting here, too. The package "sublime-text" owns the icons with "-", too.
NoMore201 commented on 2015-09-26 08:28 (UTC)
@sender now is ok! I don't now why but I needed to do the same thing for the android studio .desktop file
sender commented on 2015-09-25 15:52 (UTC)
@NoMore66201 I checked using `xprop WM_CLASS`, but this already returns `WM_CLASS(STRING) = "subl3", "Subl3"`. I implemented your suggestion anyway, can you test?
Pinned Comments
SunRed commented on 2022-02-20 11:30 (UTC)
Please note that the dev branch of this software requires a license to be purchased from the website. If you want to support this software, please consider doing so.
You can use the stable branch available at sublime-text-4 or the official package for free.
SunRed commented on 2021-05-21 13:04 (UTC)
To cut down the amount of packages to be maintained and to decrease confusion, this package is now used for the 'dev' branch of Sublime Text that is kept up to date with the most recent version. Users who want to stay on the latest legacy versions or the most recent stable release should stick to the respective stable release packages (sublime-text-3, sublime-text-4) or use the official repos provided by Sublime Text.