Package Details: sublime-text-dev 4.4184-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/sublime-text-dev.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: sublime-text-dev
Description: Sophisticated text editor for code, html and prose - dev build
Upstream URL: https://www.sublimetext.com/dev
Licenses: custom
Conflicts: sublime-text
Provides: sublime-text
Submitter: realitygaps
Maintainer: SunRed (edub4rt)
Last Packager: SunRed
Votes: 517
Popularity: 0.091538
First Submitted: 2011-11-10 18:32 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-11-27 22:50 (UTC)

Pinned Comments

SunRed commented on 2022-02-20 11:30 (UTC)

Please note that the dev branch of this software requires a license to be purchased from the website. If you want to support this software, please consider doing so.

You can use the stable branch available at sublime-text-4 or the official package for free.

SunRed commented on 2021-05-21 13:04 (UTC)

To cut down the amount of packages to be maintained and to decrease confusion, this package is now used for the 'dev' branch of Sublime Text that is kept up to date with the most recent version. Users who want to stay on the latest legacy versions or the most recent stable release should stick to the respective stable release packages (sublime-text-3, sublime-text-4) or use the official repos provided by Sublime Text.

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 .. 22 Next › Last »

gadicc commented on 2016-03-12 07:11 (UTC)

For me, some plugins (that depend on SSL) stopped working on updating from openssl 1.0.2.f-1 -> 1.0.2.g-3. No error messages outside the console, but there I found messages about being unable to import _ssl, and upon manually adding the "Linux SSL" package (in sublime), errors about OPENSSL_1.0.0 not being defined in libssl1.0.0. The quick fix was to downgrade with `pacman -U /var/cache/pacman/pkg/openssl-1.0.2.f-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz`, reload sublime, and everything worked again. Since this was a minor update, I imagine existing libraries should still work? Maybe someone who understands OpenSSL better can open an appropriate bug report, if relevant.

sender commented on 2016-02-17 08:37 (UTC)

There seems to be a lot of confusion about the ST packages. This is because the author switched names for branches. Packages: Sublime Text 3 Beta - package: sublime-text-dev - Upstream: www.sublimetext.com/3 Sublime Text 3 Dev (used to be called nightly) - package: sublime-text-nightly - upstream: www.sublimetext.com/3dev - NOTE: for registered users only If you want the absolute latest get *sublime-text-nightly*. Note that you have to be licensed to use this!

sender commented on 2016-02-09 09:12 (UTC)

Updated to 3103! First movement in the (original) dev branch since March 2015. For intermediate updates see package https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sublime-text-nightly. Note that this version is only available to licensed users only.

GomZik commented on 2016-02-09 08:27 (UTC)

Hi, here is my patch for new build http://pastebin.com/PmN1ZU2B

lukasw commented on 2016-02-09 03:44 (UTC)

Build 3103 has just been released, see https://www.sublimetext.com/blog/articles/sublime-text-3-build-3103

zerophase commented on 2016-01-23 06:05 (UTC)

I think it's that the provides and conflicts are mixed up for the two sublime-text-nightly and dev. sublime-text-nightly: Conflicts: sublime-text-dev Provides: sublime-text-dev sublime-text-dev: Conflicts: sublime-text-nightly Provides: sublime-text-nightly

Marcel_K commented on 2016-01-08 10:30 (UTC)

That's a problem with yaourt. I can't see how that is related to this package. Please file a bug at yaourt's page.

zerophase commented on 2016-01-08 05:50 (UTC)

If I try to download sublime-text-nightly, with yaourt -S --noconfirm this package gets downloaded instead.

sender commented on 2015-12-16 13:09 (UTC)

@Marcel_K Thanks!