Package Details: ffmpeg-libfdk_aac 2:7.1-3

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/ffmpeg-libfdk_aac.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: ffmpeg-libfdk_aac
Description: Complete solution to record, convert and stream audio and video (Same as official package except with libfdk-aac support)
Upstream URL: https://ffmpeg.org
Licenses: custom:libfdk-aac, GPL-3.0-only
Conflicts: ffmpeg
Provides: ffmpeg, libavcodec.so, libavdevice.so, libavfilter.so, libavformat.so, libavutil.so, libpostproc.so, libswresample.so, libswscale.so
Submitter: korrode
Maintainer: zotan
Last Packager: zotan
Votes: 65
Popularity: 0.041016
First Submitted: 2013-07-12 10:24 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-11-30 20:05 (UTC)

Dependencies (112)

Required by (1910)

Sources (2)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Next › Last »

bwidawsk commented on 2015-10-11 17:11 (UTC) (edited on 2015-10-11 17:13 (UTC) by bwidawsk)

When you try to update libx265, which has been updated, you will be greeted by an error. Note that a fresh install should be fine. I do not know how to solve this correctly (the incorrect way is to uninstall this package, update x265, then reinstall this package). Upstream rebuilt against a newer x265 and doesn't have this concern of requiring downstream to be able to upgrade across the library change. https://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/commit/trunk?h=packages/ffmpeg&id=f5ed18cff8564286cadd4cd86352be722fbda908

bwidawsk commented on 2015-09-25 00:44 (UTC)

@apastuszak As far as I know, I did this correct. I am not an expert. I mostly follow this: http://allanmcrae.com/2015/01/two-pgp-keyrings-for-package-management-in-arch-linux/

apastuszak commented on 2015-09-24 01:44 (UTC)

I'm trying to build this package and am geting the following error: ==> ERROR: One or more PGP signatures could not be verified!

gee commented on 2015-09-17 03:26 (UTC)

@bwidawsk: ffmpeg is now at 2.8 since the 8th, that's probably why the flag.

bwidawsk commented on 2015-09-09 17:48 (UTC)

5long, why did you flag the package? Upstream package still seems to be at 2.7.2 to me. Did I miss something?

bwidawsk commented on 2015-07-31 05:19 (UTC)

Okay. I think it should be fixed now. Please let me know if it isn't.

bwidawsk commented on 2015-07-30 19:08 (UTC)

I've seen the x264 complain myself and I never did manage to figure out what's going on. @dsreyes1014, if @korrode's PKGBUILD works for you, I'd be very interested to know. @korrode The reason qt-faststart is included in provides is because when I did the merge two weeks ago, the upstream package had no provides (it was added last week: https://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/commit/trunk/PKGBUILD?h=packages/ffmpeg&id=b0e50c53da8ecde14d2af2154a431e47536c31b7). I actually believe the upstream package should be doing this or else some filesystem conflicts could occur /me shrugs. I'll do another merge from upstream later tonight to pull in anything new. Thanks. @korrode again, you sure you don't want ownership?

dsreyes1014 commented on 2015-07-30 14:17 (UTC)

@korrode: It's the latter. I'll try updating ffmpeg first and see how that goes. Thanks for your quick response.

korrode commented on 2015-07-30 13:38 (UTC)

Also i just saw that the SoX resampler is now being used in the official package: https://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/commit/trunk?h=packages/ffmpeg&id=636e41fcbd627ac5d130c893771437b575e2c703 https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/45186 I'd suggest adding it to this too, i just did on AUR3.

korrode commented on 2015-07-30 13:34 (UTC)

Also bwidawsk the package is out of date. The package on AUR3 that i'm still maintainer of was flagged out of date and i updated it, so you could just grab source from there... but fyi in mine i don't have "qt-faststart" in the provides array because the official Arch package doesn't have it, so neither do/did i. ...but it's yours now so up to you.

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Next › Last »