Package Details: firefox-beta-bin 133.0rc1-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/firefox-beta-bin.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: firefox-beta-bin
Description: Standalone web browser from mozilla.org - Beta
Upstream URL: https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/channel/#beta
Keywords: gecko
Licenses: GPL, MPL, LGPL
Conflicts: firefox-beta
Provides: firefox
Submitter: Schnouki
Maintainer: symen (bittin)
Last Packager: bittin
Votes: 398
Popularity: 1.26
First Submitted: 2010-07-07 09:05 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-11-19 07:46 (UTC)

Dependencies (13)

Required by (167)

Sources (4)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 .. 51 Next › Last »

axil42 commented on 2011-10-07 20:25 (UTC)

They seem to have changed the sha1sums. When I uploaded it in the morning, the x86_64 firefox passed the validity check. Check again now, should work fine ;)

hasardeur commented on 2011-10-07 20:13 (UTC)

makepkg fails with "==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check!". The check sum of the downloaded file is f58e414a7d108706293fdc5994a09f5754b3e056 for firefox-8.0b2.tar.bz2. I am running x86_64 but i686 fails too. Does anyone else experience this?

darehanl commented on 2011-09-12 03:08 (UTC)

Anyone know how to get this version of Firefox to recognize file associations in KDE? I already have libgnome installed and the regular Firefox works fine.

fsckd commented on 2011-08-18 16:38 (UTC)

Please quote, e.g. cd "$srcdir" instead of cd $srcdir. Thanks. :)

axil42 commented on 2011-08-13 15:35 (UTC)

Now I feel like first grade in english class... Sorry man I misunderstood you big time. Thanks for your concern :)

Det commented on 2011-08-13 15:23 (UTC)

Christ, please, tell me, have I really grown friggin incapable of forwarding information? I meant _other_ people that if you disowned it (and if it wasn't flagged out-of-date) then _other_ people would kindly just flag it instead of even thinking of doing the oh-so-hard updating themselves (even if they actually opened up the browser and came all the way up here to do the flagging). I didn't mean you, take all the time you need in your vacation, have a good time and definitely don't let people like me let you feel bad about it.

axil42 commented on 2011-08-13 15:07 (UTC)

First of all I wasn't the one that flagged it out of date. I'm on vacation right now and cannot update it. I really can't understand your hostile tone man. If you think that I'm incapable of maintaining it I'll gladly disown it.

Det commented on 2011-08-13 14:55 (UTC)

If you care enough to make a comment about it would it be all too bad to disown it for other people to update it? Well, admittably it would be pretty talented to find someone willing to do that instead of just flagging..

axil42 commented on 2011-08-13 13:20 (UTC)

Unfortunately I won't be near a computer till thursday and thus the package will have to be outdated till then... Thanks.

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 .. 51 Next › Last »