Search Criteria
Package Details: mingw-w64-openssl 3.4.1-1
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/mingw-w64-openssl.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | mingw-w64-openssl |
Description: | The Open Source toolkit for Secure Sockets Layer and Transport Layer Security (mingw-w64) |
Upstream URL: | https://www.openssl.org |
Keywords: | mingw mingw-w64 openssl |
Licenses: | Apache-2.0 |
Submitter: | brcha |
Maintainer: | pingplug (Martchus) |
Last Packager: | Martchus |
Votes: | 25 |
Popularity: | 0.000000 |
First Submitted: | 2012-06-13 15:52 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2025-02-12 17:46 (UTC) |
Dependencies (4)
- mingw-w64-zlibAUR
- mingw-w64-environmentAUR (llvm-mingw-w64-environmentAUR) (make)
- mingw-w64-gcc (llvm-mingw-w64-toolchain-ucrt-binAUR, llvm-mingw-w64-toolchain-msvcrt-binAUR) (make)
- perl (perl-gitAUR) (make)
Required by (32)
- mingw-w64-civetweb (optional)
- mingw-w64-curl
- mingw-w64-gnutls (optional)
- mingw-w64-libarchive
- mingw-w64-libevent
- mingw-w64-libgit2
- mingw-w64-libpcap
- mingw-w64-librtmp0
- mingw-w64-libssh
- mingw-w64-libssh2
- mingw-w64-libwebsockets
- mingw-w64-libzip
- mingw-w64-minizip-ng
- mingw-w64-passwordfile
- mingw-w64-passwordmanager
- mingw-w64-postgresql
- mingw-w64-python2
- mingw-w64-python310-bin
- mingw-w64-python311-bin
- mingw-w64-python312-bin
- Show 12 more...
Latest Comments
1 2 3 4 5 Next › Last »
bepaald commented on 2025-02-15 14:26 (UTC)
Currently, this package does not work for me anymore. It builds and installs fine, no errors, but the lib is abnormally large. Programs linked against it (statically) are also huge and fail to run.
I do not think this is a problem with this package, as downgrading
mingw-w64-binutils
seems to fix it. Without downgrading, older versions of this package (that I know used to work fine) show the same problems. But I just wanted to mention it here, and see if anyone can confirm these findings.For reference, building this on a fully updated system gives:
After downgrading
mingw-w64-binutils
(back to 2.39-1) and rebooting:While investigating this issue, I did of course check this program's PKGBUILD and found that it checks
if [[ $_arch != 'aarch64-w64-mingw32' ]]
but the aarch64 target is not present in_architectures
, so I feel that is probably not on purpose.Thanks!
Martchus commented on 2024-10-22 15:27 (UTC)
I changed it back to sha256 for consistency with the regular openssl package and because upstream provides a sha256 checksum file for cross-checking but not a b2 one.
Martchus commented on 2022-11-03 15:51 (UTC)
I updated to 1.1.1.s in my binary repo (see https://github.com/Martchus/PKGBUILDs/commit/1c971e96f516d340c94b7dfa5c045f137afc28a9 for the source) to have a current version until everything is rebuilt against v3. Since v3 of the regular package is already in testing I suppose we can go on with switching to v3 here as well. Then I'll rebuild at least everything in my binary repo and try to fix packages that don't build anymore. I've also been updating mingw-w64-openssl-1.1 which can be used as a fallback if packages don't build anymore.
micwoj92 commented on 2022-05-07 09:24 (UTC)
You should bump epoch when doing pkgver downgrade.
bepaald commented on 2022-03-15 15:47 (UTC)
Thanks for maintaining this, and fixing the lib location. But, I think you meant to do pkgrel=4, instead of 2. It's going backwards now...
Martchus commented on 2022-03-15 15:16 (UTC)
It builds but 64-bit libs are wrongly installed under
lib64
.Martchus commented on 2022-03-15 14:15 (UTC)
I'm going to add mingw-w64-openssl-1.1, should only take a few minutes. Rebuilding and possibly patching all the other packages will be the real fun. (I'll add packages to https://martchus.no-ip.biz/repo/arch/ownstuff-staging/os/x86_64.)
micwoj92 commented on 2022-03-04 17:06 (UTC)
Yes, mingw-w64-openssl-1.1 is good idea, there is even openssl-1.1 package in official repos (in staging, but still)
Martchus commented on 2022-03-04 12:48 (UTC)
Since the regular openssl package hasn't been updated to 3.x yet I'll also wait with updating my binary repo. Maybe we also need mingw-w64-openssl-1.1 as not all projects might be compatible at this point.
Btw, the "TODO" for my binary repository comprises the following packages:
patlefort commented on 2022-01-02 02:39 (UTC) (edited on 2022-01-02 02:39 (UTC) by patlefort)
Does not compile with LTO:
It might be a good idea to disable it for this package by adding
!lto
inoptions=()
.1 2 3 4 5 Next › Last »