Package Details: octopi 0.16.2-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/octopi.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: octopi
Description: A powerful Pacman frontend using Qt libs
Upstream URL: https://tintaescura.com/projects/octopi
Licenses: GPL-2.0-or-later
Conflicts: octopi-notifier
Provides: octopi-cachecleaner, octopi-notifier, octopi-repoeditor
Submitter: ImNtReal
Maintainer: yochananmarqos
Last Packager: yochananmarqos
Votes: 1564
Popularity: 33.98
First Submitted: 2013-09-03 23:42 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-06-18 16:53 (UTC)

Dependencies (17)

Required by (0)

Sources (1)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 .. 39 Next › Last »

hells commented on 2016-08-19 21:06 (UTC)

I agree. I am also using Yaourt, so perhaps this is an issue with it and not other AUR helpers? I'll spend some time here and see if pacaur has the same issues.

ImNtReal commented on 2016-08-19 19:16 (UTC)

This is why I resisted having multiple notifier packages built from the one octopi package, but after looking at the Manjaro package thought it was worth a shot. It really seems like something AUR helpers should be able to build support for, though.

matmoul commented on 2016-08-19 18:37 (UTC)

I confirm the conflict problem... After error when update octopi, I have also removed all packages ans same problem. But you can install it manually after compilation... cd /tmp/yaourt-tmp-... pacman -U octopi-pacmanhelper-0.8.3-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz pacman -U octopi-0.8.3-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz pacman -U octopi-repoeditor-0.8.3-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz pacman -U octopi-cachecleaner-0.8.3-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz

hells commented on 2016-08-19 15:18 (UTC)

It seems this latest update made Octopi a little sad: :: octopi-notifier-frameworks and octopi-notifier-qt4 are in conflict That's after I removed everything octopi related and reinstalled it. Prior to that, I was just upgrading the package and kept getting this error: :: octopi-notifier-qt4 and octopi-notifier-qt5 are in conflict Thanks!

kikadf commented on 2016-08-19 13:27 (UTC) (edited on 2016-08-19 13:31 (UTC) by kikadf)

Hm.. I prefer to use stable release instead of git version with fake pkgver. I haven't problem with octopi build/notifications. My opinion, Manjaro's way is LOL, not follow them. Keep the stable, or use git version without lie. It is your decision.

ImNtReal commented on 2016-08-19 12:53 (UTC)

Well, let's give this a try.

kikadf commented on 2016-08-18 19:58 (UTC) (edited on 2016-08-18 20:00 (UTC) by kikadf)

Manjaro use git version, not the stable release... https://github.com/manjaro/packages-community/blob/master/octopi/PKGBUILD Just they say, this is the 0.8.3 ... sed -i -e "s|0.9.0 (dev)|${pkgver}-${pkgrel}|g" src/strconstants.h LOL!

ImNtReal commented on 2016-08-18 19:51 (UTC)

Can someone point me to the source they're using, or their PKGBUILD? 0.8.3 hasn't been tagged as a release on github.

philo commented on 2016-08-18 09:59 (UTC)

Manjaro now offers version 0.8.3-1. Shall we get it here?

ImNtReal commented on 2016-08-11 19:45 (UTC)

I'm not seeing 0.8.2 tagged on their github page. If I need to look somewhere else for it, please, let me know.

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 .. 39 Next › Last »