Package Details: paru 2.0.4-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/paru.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: paru
Description: Feature packed AUR helper
Upstream URL: https://github.com/morganamilo/paru
Keywords: AUR helper pacman rust wrapper yay
Licenses: GPL-3.0-or-later
Submitter: Morganamilo
Maintainer: Morganamilo
Last Packager: Morganamilo
Votes: 982
Popularity: 19.64
First Submitted: 2020-10-19 00:43 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-09-20 18:50 (UTC)

Dependencies (6)

Sources (1)

Pinned Comments

haxie commented on 2023-05-26 17:45 (UTC)

you're better off contacting her via the github, this comments section is 90% "it's out of date" from people who didn't scroll down before posting

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 .. 24 Next › Last »

Toric commented on 2022-01-02 06:53 (UTC)

paru -S paru
:: Resolving dependencies...
:: Calculating conflicts...
:: Calculating inner conflicts...

Aur (1) paru-1.9.2-1

:: Proceed to review? [Y/n]: y

:: Downloading PKGBUILDs...
 (1/1) paru-1.9.2-1                                  [---------------------------------------------------------]
:: Proceed with installation? [Y/n]: y
fetching devel info...
==> Making package: paru 1.9.0-1 (Sun 02 Jan 2022 12:51:11 AM CST)
==> Retrieving sources...
  -> Downloading paru-1.9.0.tar.gz...

pacman thinks its installing paru 1.9.2, but downloads (and ends up installing) paru 1.9.0, leading to paru trying to upgrade itself every time it is run. Trued @th1nhhdk s advice, but files faile to sha validate, for obvious reasons. Im thinking this repository/the current paru version might be slightly broken...

<deleted-account> commented on 2021-12-08 14:34 (UTC)

If you want to use v1.9.1 then edit line 3: pkgver=1.9.0 to pkgver=1.9.1 then makepkg it, or for paru-bin: https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/915042427927158854/918146456291012689/paru-1.9.1-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.zst

epoch32 commented on 2021-12-07 02:22 (UTC)

Why is this still at 1.9.0 when 1.9.1 is out? Is there a regression or bug going on? I'm curious.

johnnybash commented on 2021-11-18 16:08 (UTC)

pkgconf belongs to base-devel, so there's no need for a dependency.

egore911 commented on 2021-11-18 15:54 (UTC) (edited on 2021-11-18 15:55 (UTC) by egore911)

Please add a makedepends to pkgconf, otherwise the build fails:

thread 'main' panicked at 'called `Result::unwrap()` on an `Err` value: Could not run `"pkg-config" "--libs" "--cflags" "libalpm" "libalpm >= 13.0.0"`
The pkg-config command could not be found.

huglwutz commented on 2021-11-13 10:04 (UTC)

Got the same error, your rust toolchain is outdated. rfonseca posted the solution.

rfonseca commented on 2021-11-12 19:51 (UTC) (edited on 2021-11-12 19:51 (UTC) by rfonseca)

I was also getting the same compilation error. The problem was that rustc was not updated.

I've installed rustup instead of the rust package. So I had to run rustup update to update rustc and after that it worked.

Ineu commented on 2021-11-05 13:00 (UTC)

This package does not build after the update:

error: doc alias attribute expects a string: #[doc(alias = "0")]
  --> /home/ineu/.cargo/registry/src/github.com-1ecc6299db9ec823/alpm-2.1.3/src/db.rs:13:7
   |
13 | #[doc(alias("repo", "repository"))]
   |       ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

   Compiling locale_config v0.3.0
   Compiling env_logger v0.9.0
error: aborting due to previous error

error: could not compile `alpm`

To learn more, run the command again with --verbose.
warning: build failed, waiting for other jobs to finish...

alerque commented on 2021-08-12 07:25 (UTC)

Actually yes, I think doas / su / friends should be listed as optdepends here.

Also this should probably depend on base-devel. It is assumed for all package building scenarios, and even though it is part of the instructions to install this, right now you can install it (e.g. directly from my unofficial user repository) on a fresh base system without being forewarned that it really needs base-devel to function as anything beyond a pacman alias.

Alad commented on 2021-08-11 21:32 (UTC) (edited on 2021-08-11 21:33 (UTC) by Alad)

By that logic pacman should (opt)depend on fakeroot and sudo too, because makepkg uses them at runtime. Anyway I guess the issue at hand is that people specifically remove sudo after installing base-devel, because they want to use doas or su or some such. That's going to lead to issues down the road either way, e.g. when using devtools.