Package Details: paru 2.0.4-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/paru.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: paru
Description: Feature packed AUR helper
Upstream URL: https://github.com/morganamilo/paru
Keywords: AUR helper pacman rust wrapper yay
Licenses: GPL-3.0-or-later
Submitter: Morganamilo
Maintainer: Morganamilo
Last Packager: Morganamilo
Votes: 982
Popularity: 19.64
First Submitted: 2020-10-19 00:43 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-09-20 18:50 (UTC)

Dependencies (6)

Sources (1)

Pinned Comments

haxie commented on 2023-05-26 17:45 (UTC)

you're better off contacting her via the github, this comments section is 90% "it's out of date" from people who didn't scroll down before posting

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Next › Last »

dominicegginton commented on 2021-08-10 11:23 (UTC)

@alad, sudo is included in the base-devel, however should still be listed as an optdepends=(). I believe listing sudo in optdepends=() makes it clear for PKGBUILD readers.

alerque commented on 2021-08-10 07:09 (UTC)

@Alad That logic applies to makedepends=(), not for depends=(). Anything is base-deve! is presumed and does not need to be listed as a build time dependency. In this case sudo is a optional run time dependency, hence it can (and I believe should) be listed as such. It is not part of base.

Alad commented on 2021-08-09 07:15 (UTC)

sudo is part of base-devel, so no, it should not be listed as a dependency - not a regular one, nor an optional one.

dominicegginton commented on 2021-07-27 08:16 (UTC)

@alergue,I agree, sudo should be listed as an optdepends.

alerque commented on 2021-07-27 08:10 (UTC)

@mimshipio No, there are several things you can do with this without sudo, and there are alternative ways of gaining escalated privileges. It should probably be listed as an optdepends though.

mimshipio commented on 2021-07-27 01:06 (UTC)

Shouldn't sudo be a dependency? I mean paru needs sudo for privilege elevation to install packages

adrianteri commented on 2021-07-19 14:31 (UTC)

Thanks @alerque.

alerque commented on 2021-07-19 13:13 (UTC)

@adrianteri It sounds like you cloned the wrong repo. You don't clone the GitHub source repo, you clone this packaging repo (link above in package details). The PKGBUILD is very much there ;-)

adrianteri commented on 2021-07-19 12:50 (UTC)

QN on first installation(Using instructions in README). The PKGBUILD is missing from the cloned GiHub repo is this by design or was removed by mistake?