AUR (en) - waterfox

Search Criteria

Package Details: waterfox G6.0.20-1

Git Clone URL:	https://aur.archlinux.org/waterfox.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base:	waterfox
Description:	Fork of Mozilla Firefox featuring some privacy, usability, and speed enhancements.
Upstream URL:	https://www.waterfox.net/
Keywords:	browser firefox waterfox web
Licenses:	MPL-2.0
Submitter:	random-nick
Maintainer:	matthewq337
Last Packager:	matthewq337
Votes:	15
Popularity:	0.22
First Submitted:	2020-02-21 16:04 (UTC)
Last Updated:	2024-10-30 20:35 (UTC)

Git Clone URL:

https://aur.archlinux.org/waterfox.git (read-only, click to copy)

Package Base:

waterfox

Description:

Fork of Mozilla Firefox featuring some privacy, usability, and speed enhancements.

Upstream URL:

https://www.waterfox.net/

Keywords:

browser firefox waterfox web

Licenses:

MPL-2.0

Submitter:

random-nick

Maintainer:

matthewq337

Last Packager:

matthewq337

Votes:

Popularity:

0.22

First Submitted:

2020-02-21 16:04 (UTC)

Last Updated:

2024-10-30 20:35 (UTC)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 2

okasion commented on 2020-09-29 01:49 (UTC)

Please note that the build takes about 3 hours on my machine, and at two points of the build process (the two times libxul.so is linked) it fills my RAM and starts swapping. You might want to use the waterfox-current-bin package instead.

Thanks, I was wondering how much time it would take to build this.

random-nick commented on 2020-08-21 21:57 (UTC)

Thank you ccorn, added them both to makedepends.

ccorn commented on 2020-08-21 17:55 (UTC)

I needed to add libpulse to depends and lld to makedepends to make a chroot build succeed.

random-nick commented on 2020-03-25 16:11 (UTC)

Thank you PongTea, fixed.

PongTea commented on 2020-03-25 06:34 (UTC)

There is a typo in the Package details, Upstream URL: https://www.watefox.net/ Should be: https://www.waterfox.net/

hawkeye116477 commented on 2020-03-01 11:54 (UTC) (edited on 2020-03-04 07:50 (UTC) by hawkeye116477)

Binary is called waterfox in case of both - Current and Classic, but official package names are waterfox-current and waterfox-classic. Naming package as „waterfox" is rather not very proper. If Current instead of would be stable and Classic beta, then it would be more proper...

random-nick commented on 2020-02-23 15:23 (UTC)

The binary is called waterfox, like in the official distribution.

hawkeye116477 commented on 2020-02-22 09:10 (UTC) (edited on 2020-02-22 09:15 (UTC) by hawkeye116477)

Shouldn't this package be named waterfox-current?

random-nick commented on 2020-02-21 16:21 (UTC) (edited on 2020-02-21 16:22 (UTC) by random-nick)