Package Details: zfs-linux 2.2.7_6.12.4.arch1.1-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/zfs-linux.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: zfs-linux
Description: Kernel modules for the Zettabyte File System.
Upstream URL: https://openzfs.org/
Keywords: kernel linux zfs
Licenses: CDDL
Groups: archzfs-linux
Conflicts: spl-dkms, spl-dkms-git, spl-linux, zfs-dkms, zfs-dkms-git, zfs-dkms-rc, zfs-linux-git, zfs-linux-rc
Provides: spl, zfs
Replaces: spl-linux
Submitter: demizer
Maintainer: lightdot
Last Packager: lightdot
Votes: 272
Popularity: 1.52
First Submitted: 2016-04-21 08:45 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-12-14 03:30 (UTC)

Required by (19)

Sources (1)

Latest Comments

1 2 3 4 5 6 .. 79 Next › Last »

woodsb02 commented on 2024-12-17 00:02 (UTC)

Is your dataset encrypted, and if so was this send|receive with encrypted or unencrypted data? What kernel are you using?

AustrianToast commented on 2024-12-16 21:57 (UTC) (edited on 2024-12-16 21:57 (UTC) by AustrianToast)

After upgrading and immediatly trying to do a backup with snapshots, during the zfs send/ zfs recv I suffured from data curruption of not only my data but also of the pool metadata. All I could confirm that this is not a hardware issue and thus leads me to believe this is a problem of this package or also could be zfs-utils. I would advise to downgrade again to the 2.2.4 version of ZFS.

lightdot commented on 2024-10-23 12:36 (UTC) (edited on 2024-10-23 12:37 (UTC) by lightdot)

I have taken over the package and downgraded to kernel 6.10 for the time being. The 6.11 kernel is not compatible with ZFS 2.2.6, errors have been reported in practical use.

Note that the archzfs project is being restarted, additional information is available here: https://github.com/archzfs/archzfs/issues/545

Carlosgrr commented on 2024-10-22 18:42 (UTC) (edited on 2024-10-22 18:44 (UTC) by Carlosgrr)

I noticed that 6.11 is being used as the new zfs-linux base, but it is currently experimental upstream, see it here: https://github.com/archzfs/archzfs/issues/545 and here: https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/discussions/16574 Wouldn't it be safer to use 6.10 as the base until zfs 2.7?

justinnnn commented on 2024-10-06 21:14 (UTC)

Appears archfs is abandoned now. Hopefully someone capable is able to get it going again.

https://github.com/archzfs/archzfs/issues/545

Egns commented on 2024-09-24 18:13 (UTC) (edited on 2024-09-24 18:14 (UTC) by Egns)

This project is abandoned and no longer supported by the maintainer, more discussion is happening here: https://github.com/archzfs/archzfs/pull/550

gmtch commented on 2024-09-18 08:03 (UTC)

Please can we have an update on the status of this package? It is now two months since I was able to install a new kernel

Is this the issue?

https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=298600

baites commented on 2024-09-14 00:27 (UTC)

Is the project still maintained? We are almost at 6.10.10 and ZFS 2.6 is out.

Moggele commented on 2024-08-19 09:11 (UTC) (edited on 2024-08-19 09:11 (UTC) by Moggele)

yay -S zfs-linux

-> could not find all required packages: zfs-utils =2.2.4

jimreynold2nd commented on 2024-06-11 19:53 (UTC)

This seems to work fine with the latest kernel:

diff --git a/PKGBUILD b/PKGBUILD
index 0c50475..b9b9af6 100644
--- a/PKGBUILD
+++ b/PKGBUILD
@@ -18,8 +18,8 @@
 pkgbase="zfs-linux"
 pkgname=("zfs-linux" "zfs-linux-headers")
 _zfsver="2.2.4"
-_kernelver="6.9.2.arch1-1"
-_kernelver_full="6.9.2.arch1-1"
+_kernelver="6.9.3.arch1-1"
+_kernelver_full="6.9.3.arch1-1"
 _extramodules="${_kernelver_full/.arch/-arch}"