Package Details: zfs-linux 2.2.6_6.10.10.arch1.1-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/zfs-linux.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: zfs-linux
Description: Kernel modules for the Zettabyte File System.
Upstream URL: https://openzfs.org/
Keywords: kernel linux zfs
Licenses: CDDL
Groups: archzfs-linux
Conflicts: spl-dkms, spl-dkms-git, spl-linux, zfs-dkms, zfs-dkms-git, zfs-dkms-rc, zfs-linux-git, zfs-linux-rc
Provides: spl, zfs
Replaces: spl-linux
Submitter: demizer
Maintainer: lightdot
Last Packager: lightdot
Votes: 271
Popularity: 1.18
First Submitted: 2016-04-21 08:45 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-10-23 12:35 (UTC)

Required by (19)

Sources (1)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 .. 79 Next › Last »

demizer commented on 2016-04-20 06:31 (UTC)

Folks, I merely updated the packages using the old method. The refactor is going to take a little longer. Thanks

demizer commented on 2016-04-19 18:12 (UTC)

Everyone, The latest update will come later tonight as I am in the process of moving the archzfs repo to archzfs.com Thanks.

kerberizer commented on 2016-04-18 20:00 (UTC) (edited on 2016-04-18 20:59 (UTC) by kerberizer)

Using ACLs on ZFS? Be warned: there was a relatively serious regression recently, which has been fixed by this commit... https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/commit/98f03691a4c08f38ca4538c468e9523f8e6b24be I still cannot confirm that it does fix the problem though. Note: This is the same problem already reported by @ukhippo. Edit: Those affected by the issue might want to follow the discussion here and possibly share their experience as well: https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/issues/4537 For me, the problem seems to persist, but it's also possible that I have missed something important.

demizer commented on 2016-04-18 05:22 (UTC) (edited on 2016-04-18 05:22 (UTC) by demizer)

Hello again! Forgot to mention, in order to make things easier for me and to clean up the PKGBUILDS, I am dropping support for i686 kernels. The ZFSOnLinux maintainers do not recommend using ZFS with 32bit ARCH http://zfsonlinux.org/faq.html#WhyShouldIUseA64BitSystem and supporting i686 complicates the PKGBUILDs: https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/tree/PKGBUILD?h=spl-git#n15 Also, I get about 2 hits per month for i686 files, while x86_64 gets about 400 per month. http://imgur.com/CU8q9J1 Sorry for the inconvenience this may cause at least two people that are still using 32bit. Thanks

demizer commented on 2016-04-17 17:23 (UTC) (edited on 2016-04-17 17:24 (UTC) by demizer)

Hello! Heads up everyone, I will be making some breaking changes in the next few days. 1. archzfs-git will track HEAD of https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs A new package group "archzfs" (zfs,zfs-utils,spl,spl-utils) will be added that builds from source for the stock kernel since upstream has been reliably supporting the latest kernel as it is released for more than a year now. 2. The archzfs repo will move to archzfs.com I will be moving the repo to archzfs.com and renaming it to just "archzfs". The same signing key will be used. 3. Better support for multiple kernels. I will modify the PKGBUILDS so that multiple archzfs packages can be installed side by side. For example archzfs and archzfs-lts. Thanks

ukhippo commented on 2016-04-16 19:24 (UTC)

Anyone else having problems with ACLs? Just upgraded to kernel 4.5.0-1 and In my journal I now have a number of "ACL operation on /var/log/journal... Failed: invalid argument" errors. Trying to use getfacl errors with invalid argument for any file on the zfs fs, but works on my boot partition files (which is vfat). My pool does have "xattr=sa" and "acltype=posixacl" set, and mount shows it has been mounted with xattr,posixacl options.

IMcD23 commented on 2016-04-01 00:38 (UTC)

@abrilevskiy, try the zfs-dkms-git AUR instead.

severach commented on 2016-03-16 16:34 (UTC)

https://github.com/severach/ArchLinuxScripts I made a shell script. It applies uname -r or not, as desired to all 4 PKGBUILD.

irate.overlord commented on 2016-03-16 01:27 (UTC)

@techmunk : what file is this patch applied to?

techmunk commented on 2016-03-10 21:49 (UTC)

I use the patch below along with clean-chroot-manager (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/clean-chroot-manager). Works a treat, and I don't have to wait for demizer to update for a new kernel version, but I should still get ZFS updates just fine. diff --git a/PKGBUILD b/PKGBUILD index 2848946..20e1114 100644 --- a/PKGBUILD +++ b/PKGBUILD @@ -12,21 +12,9 @@ pkgver=0.6.5.4_r0_g1ffc4c1_4.4.3_1 pkgrel=1 license=('CDDL') -# Used incase the i686 and x86_64 linux packages get out of sync with the -# PKGREL. This occurred on January 31, 2014 where i686 was versioned at -# 3.12.9-1 and x86_64 was versioned at 3.12.9-2. -_kernel_version_x32="4.4.3-1" -_kernel_version_x32_full="4.4.3-1" -_kernel_version_x64="4.4.3-1" -_kernel_version_x64_full="4.4.3-1" - -if [[ $CARCH == "i686" ]]; then - _kernel_version=${_kernel_version_x32} - _kernel_version_full=${_kernel_version_x32_full} -else - _kernel_version=${_kernel_version_x64} - _kernel_version_full=${_kernel_version_x64_full} -fi +_kernel_version="$(/usr/bin/pacman -Ss ^linux$ | /usr/bin/grep ^core/linux | /usr/bin/cut -d ' ' -f 2)" +_kernel_version_full="$_kernel_version" +pkgver="${pkgver%_*_*}_${_kernel_version//-/_}" pkgdesc="Kernel modules for the Zettabyte File System." depends=("spl-git" "zfs-utils-git" "linux=${_kernel_version}")

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 .. 79 Next › Last »