Package Details: nvidia-utils-beta 565.77-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/nvidia-utils-beta.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: nvidia-utils-beta
Description: NVIDIA drivers utilities (beta version)
Upstream URL: https://www.nvidia.com/
Licenses: LicenseRef-custom
Conflicts: nvidia-libgl, nvidia-utils
Provides: nvidia-libgl, nvidia-libgl-beta, nvidia-utils, opengl-driver, vulkan-driver
Replaces: nvidia-libgl
Submitter: None
Maintainer: dbermond
Last Packager: dbermond
Votes: 345
Popularity: 0.50
First Submitted: 2008-08-19 21:42 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-12-07 13:29 (UTC)

Dependencies (7)

Required by (307)

Sources (8)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 .. 23 Next › Last »

Det commented on 2016-01-14 18:46 (UTC)

# pacman -Qo /usr/lib/libnvidia-cfg.so.1

Doctor_Mooch commented on 2016-01-14 18:46 (UTC)

Ive been getting an issue when trying to update this package through Yaourt. error: failed to commit transaction (conflicting files) nvidia-utils-beta: /usr/lib/libnvidia-cfg.so.1 exists in filesystem Errors occurred, no packages were upgraded. Upon searching this issue, some have indicated it may be a conflict with Mesa. Any ideas?

AnAkkk commented on 2016-01-12 08:11 (UTC)

@buxit: it doesn't need any symlinks, see https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/47688

buxit commented on 2016-01-12 08:05 (UTC) (edited on 2016-01-12 08:05 (UTC) by buxit)

for this to work with bumblebee / primus i have to add two symlinks manually: ln -s "/usr/lib32/nvidia/libGLX.so.0" "/usr/lib32/libGLX.so.0" ln -s "/usr/lib/nvidia/libGLX.so.0" "/usr/lib/libGLX.so.0" (maybe the bumblebee package should do this, since it claims to provide nvidia-libgl?)

Det commented on 2016-01-08 18:40 (UTC) (edited on 2016-01-08 19:04 (UTC) by Det)

Father Plattner is back! I remember that bug report now, where you mentioned that library is not required (https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/38604). I shall have it removed then and inform Svenstaro, who's probably not subscribed. Thank-you for your time. E: This was apparently also reported way back in February 2008: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/9596

aplattner commented on 2016-01-08 18:20 (UTC)

You shouldn't need libnvidia-wfb.so. That's for really old X servers that don't supply their own libwfb.so.

Det commented on 2016-01-07 17:13 (UTC)

Do I get to be a contributor on that one? :D

svenstaro commented on 2016-01-07 11:44 (UTC)

@Det, I'm gonna sync your changes and stuff them into [testing].

Det commented on 2016-01-06 22:53 (UTC)

> here (in arch) and with the last update > edit: every day that passes my english gets worse :S Well, each time there's a confirmed cross-distribution bug like that, you can be almost certain, we have it too. I just tried, and sddm doesn't start for me either with 361.

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 .. 23 Next › Last »