Package Details: jre 23.0.1-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/jdk.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: jdk
Description: Oracle Java Runtime Environment
Upstream URL: https://www.oracle.com/java/
Licenses: LicenseRef-custom
Conflicts: jdk
Provides: java-runtime, java-runtime-headless, java-runtime-headless-jdk, java-runtime-jdk23, jre23-jdk, jre23-jdk-headless
Submitter: td123
Maintainer: dbermond
Last Packager: dbermond
Votes: 1087
Popularity: 0.90
First Submitted: 2011-08-27 17:56 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-11-16 14:08 (UTC)

Dependencies (12)

Required by (1733)

Sources (9)

Pinned Comments

dbermond commented on 2024-03-19 19:54 (UTC)

  • Important notice:

As was made with the java packages in the official repositories, jdk now provides the jre alongside it, and both packages conflict with each other. During the package upgrade to version 22, act accordingly to your needs. For example, if you have both jdk and jre installed, only jdk will be sufficient, as it now also contains the runtime environment, and jre can be uninstalled. If you have only jre installed, no action is required.

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 .. 81 Next › Last »

silent commented on 2012-10-18 16:19 (UTC)

Yes, yaourt asked me about the conflict and jre should have been removed completely. It is not nice to force removal as 33 packages depend on jre, but OK.

Det commented on 2012-10-18 16:18 (UTC)

Pfft.. but it doesn't make sense because first off, jre actually _conflicts_ with this one now (so you shouldn't be able to even get that far) and secondly, it's just a _symlink_, which should be removed before upgrading _anyway_ so in what point could it possibly convert itself into a folder? I just tried installing jre and jdk 7.9-1 back and the -2 upgrade went just fine. I remember running into this problem at some point yesterday, though, but still no idea what's causing it.

nicoulaj commented on 2012-10-18 16:07 (UTC)

jre. You have to force remove jre before upgrading jdk: sudo pacman -Rdd jre

Det commented on 2012-10-18 15:55 (UTC)

Uhh.. what package are those owned by (pacman -Qo)?

silent commented on 2012-10-18 15:52 (UTC)

error: failed to commit transaction (conflicting files) jdk: /usr/share/licenses/jdk/COPYRIGHT exists in filesystem jdk: /usr/share/licenses/jdk/LICENSE exists in filesystem jdk: /usr/share/licenses/jdk/THIRDPARTYLICENSEREADME-JAVAFX.txt exists in filesystem jdk: /usr/share/licenses/jdk/THIRDPARTYLICENSEREADME.txt exists in filesystem

Det commented on 2012-10-18 14:14 (UTC)

Who took his vote from this pacakge?! GIVE IT BACK.

Det commented on 2012-10-18 14:13 (UTC)

And to inform you guys too, I've now included PKGEXT=".pkg.tar" in this package because even on my 6-core system the compression still took almost two minutes. The downside of it is that the size also increased from 69 megabytes to 222, though. So happy HDD shoppings and naggings to make me change it back.

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 .. 81 Next › Last »