Package Details: jdk 23.0.1-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/jdk.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: jdk
Description: Oracle Java Development Kit
Upstream URL: https://www.oracle.com/java/
Licenses: LicenseRef-custom
Conflicts: jre
Provides: java-environment, java-environment-jdk, java-runtime, java-runtime-headless, java-runtime-headless-jdk, java-runtime-jdk23, jdk23-jdk, jre, jre23-jdk, jre23-jdk-headless
Submitter: td123
Maintainer: dbermond
Last Packager: dbermond
Votes: 1087
Popularity: 0.90
First Submitted: 2011-08-27 17:56 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-11-16 14:08 (UTC)

Required by (2651)

Sources (9)

Pinned Comments

dbermond commented on 2024-03-19 19:54 (UTC)

  • Important notice:

As was made with the java packages in the official repositories, jdk now provides the jre alongside it, and both packages conflict with each other. During the package upgrade to version 22, act accordingly to your needs. For example, if you have both jdk and jre installed, only jdk will be sufficient, as it now also contains the runtime environment, and jre can be uninstalled. If you have only jre installed, no action is required.

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 .. 81 Next › Last »

igordcard commented on 2013-03-04 23:37 (UTC)

Update 17 is out...

<deleted-account> commented on 2013-02-20 11:37 (UTC)

I'm just getting this package for the comments :) Oh and to get pwned by a 3 months old java flaw.

Det commented on 2013-02-19 06:03 (UTC)

Very well.

<deleted-account> commented on 2013-02-19 03:51 (UTC)

I found that without "libxslt" the WebView (from JavaFX2) doesn't work.

Det commented on 2013-02-18 16:02 (UTC)

JRE? Why doesn't JRE provide JDK? Who knows. Maybe God was mean.

alex-eri commented on 2013-02-18 15:56 (UTC)

why it not provides java-environment=7 ?

Det commented on 2013-02-02 04:10 (UTC)

Yes. And I just ate a dolphin and invented salt. 1) Not ever once have I heard a paste just "disappearing" from pastebin without the expiration time being left as such. In fact, it seems as if the default choice was "never" 2) This had nothing to do with dead-linking the "answer" and everything to do with just hiding the useless pacman output. 3) This has come up numerous times, ever since I separated jre from jdk over 3 months ago. Had either of you actually tried Googling the output or looking for it right here instead of wondering what just happened we wouldn't have needed this stupid discussion. So just remember: searching for things you want to know helps you find them. I think everyone who has internets knows that.

Rulatir commented on 2013-02-02 00:32 (UTC)

Maybe it's because we've seen one too many a problem-solving thread where someone had posted *the perfect solution* on pastebin (because it had more than 30 LOC), and that pastebin entry had since expired? Things *disappear* from pastebin. Everyone who has internets knows that.

Det commented on 2013-01-18 18:20 (UTC)

I can't figure out why you people keep posting LONG messages in here instead of using Pastebin! Is it because of http://pastebin.com being inaccessible? Nope... Is it because you don't have internets? Nope... What is wrong with you!?!?!?!?!?!?!?

darose commented on 2013-01-18 16:04 (UTC)

Ah yes that worked. I had already tried pacman -Rd. Didn't know the 2nd "d" was needed. Tnx for the help!

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 .. 81 Next › Last »